Fernando Mancebo Rodriguez:
This author is looking for any university that wants to be in the future the depositary and guarantor of all his works, and keep them published in the web.
Spanish pages -------Facebook-in spain ------ Facebook-cosmos group
You can see many of my works, in the following pages:
COSMIC and ATOMIC MODEL ||| Video TOE, Simplified: II Physical vision
Video TOE, Simplified: I Metaphysical vision ||| Video TOE, Simplified: III Cosmic particles ||| First Video: Cosmic and atomic model
Double slit and camera obscura experiments: ferman experiment ||| Type of Waves: Questions of Quantum Mechanics
The socurces of gravity. ||| In favour of the cosmos theory of ferman FCM ||| Theory of Everything: summary
Model of Cosmos. ||| Development speed of forces.||| Magnets: N-S magnetic polarity.
Stellar molecules ||| Static and Dynamic chaos||| Inversion or Left-right proof ||| Scheme approach TOE
Chart of atomic measures||| The main foundations of the Cosmos' Structure ||| Unstable particles in accelerators
Short summary atomic model ||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.||| Mathematical cosmic model based on Pi.
Inexactness principle in observations ||| Einstein and the gravity ||| The Universal Motion ||| Atomic particles
Cosmic Geometry ||| Bipolar electronic: semiconductors ||| Multiverse or multi-worlds||| Light and photons
Quantum explanation of Gravity ||| Real physics versus virtual physics ||| The window experiment
Atomic Density ||| Linkin: Coeficients Lcf Mcf ||| Atomic nuclei structuring: Short summary
Few points about Cosmic Structuring.||| What is Time||| Simultaneity ||| The Cosmic tree ||| The Cosmic entropy
Interesting and short life of neutrons ||| Leptons field ||| Macro Microcosm, the same thing.
Fourth dimension of space.||| The way to get a unity theory||| UHECR Ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rays
Magnetic or entropy forces: types or classes||| Time observation and time emission ||| The universe expansion
Planetary Mechanics : Short summary ||| Easy explanation of the Planetary model||| State and type of Particles
Higgs boson and fields: wrong way ||| The positron proof: main types of magnetic fields ||| The gravity proof
Current state of cosmology ||| Electromagnetic charges: reason and procedure ||| Neutron: The short and interesting life of
Type of Magnetic Forces ||| The big-bang and Universe' expansion ||| Astronomical chart: Astros, asteroids and microids
Certainty Principle: easy explanation ||| Certainty Principle and the Schrodinger's Cat ||| Wave function collapse
Relativity versus QM ||| The non-curvature of space by matter ||| The Master Clock
Ferman's light analysis ||| Cosmos basic elements, summary||| Comparative numbers in double slit experiment
Stars dimensions ||| Orbital situation of electrons ||| Bright cores versus Black holes
Summary of Ferman cosmic vision and models ||| Atomic nuclei similar to stars ||| Stationary time, but not local neither relativist
Neutrinos versus background radiation ||| Saturn says no to Einstein curvature.||| Da: Average density of energy in the cosmos
Gravity versus magnetic fields of force ||| Black holes cannot exist||| Expansion of materials by energy
Particles in accelerators: almost infinite ||| Trans-dimensional or ideal loupe||| 4D of space, time and matter
5D x 6D = Universal motion x time = Cosmic energy ||| The six cosmic dimensions
Neutrinos ||| Nature of light ||| Hydrogen atom ||| Uncertainty principle: test||| Criticism to Quantum M
Invariance Principle of Time ||| Stuffing forces and heat particles||| Physical waves and imaginary waves
Higgs fields and bosons: Imaginary elements||| Higgs bosons predictions||| Exotic particles
Stars as copies of atoms ||| ERF: Energy rebalancing forces||| Big Bang reality ||| Big-boom instead Big-bang
Genzel and Ghez observations on galaxy center ||| Maxwell demonstration on charges and electrons situation
Orbital distribution positive charges (+) arises into Everything Theory||| Ferman cage ||| Wave function collapse
Universal motion and its parameter: Time ||| Fallacy in the Uncertainty Principle ||| Brief study on the magnetic forces
The hypothetical ideal (Ubiquitous) observer ||| The neutrino test ||| Imaginary tube funnel deformation
The cosmic levels ||| The Universal Space-time constants ||| Energy, matter, mass, gravity, magnetic forces -->>> Video:
The reason of electric charges ||| Weak electromagnetic forces||| Standard Model versus ferman toe 1992
Relativity is wrong: only forces move particles ||| Stellar molecules, but no black holes ||| Space time cannnot be curved
The great incongruity in Physics ||| ---> Video
Radial coordinates.||| Physical and mathematical sets theory. | Algebraic product of sets.
Planar angles: Trimetry.||| Fractions: natural portions.||| Cosmic spiral ||| Inverse values of parameters and operation
Equivalence and commutive property of division. ||| Concepts and Numbers. ||| Bend coefficient of curves ||| Mathematical dimensions
Transposition property ||| Accumulated product: Powers ||| Dimensional Geometry: Reversibility
Priority Rule in powers and roots ||| The decimal counter ||| The floating point index ||| Paradoxes in mathematics
Direct formula for Pi: The Squaring Pi. ||| The pyramids of Squaring Pi. ||| Functions of Pi ||| Integration formulas Pi.
Squaring the Circle ||| Cocktail formula for Squaring Pi.||| Orbital coordinates in motion: Summary
Oscillating function: Cartesian oscillators ||| The ciclo as unit of angular speed ||| Squaring circles ruler and compass |||
Video: Squaring circles ruler and compass ||| The number Phi and the circumference.speed |||
The The extended Pi ||| Angles trisection||| Squaring the Circle regarding Phi||| Video of the two squares method
Discusion about the Pi as transcendental number|||: Not transcendental Pi||| The chained sets|||
Properties of equalities in limits||| The Phi right triangles ||| Pi and the Circumscription Theorem
Pi triangle by squaring the circle : Vedeo Pi triangle ||| Squaring Pi demonstration by circumscription Theorem LatexPdf
Doubling the cube ||| Framing the circle ||| Phi and Pi: relation formula ||| Squarin Pi: Principles and foundation
Squaring circle with Phi (to 0.000005 of ideal ruler and compass)||| Sbits: Static and dinamic orbital coordinates
Squaring Pi and the Floating Point ||| Planetary Vitality: formula ||| Sign of Simultaneity or coincidence
Squaring the circle by doubling the cube. ||| Video: Squaring and doubling. ||| Video: Squaring with two inscribed squares
The true number Pi ||| ---->>>> Video |||||| Cycle Pi squared|||| ------> video ||| Cyclic Pi Theorem |||| ------> video
Why is the current Pi wrong? |||| Special circumference of Pi diameter ||| ------> video
Spherical molecules. ||| Genetic Heredity. ||| Metaphysics: Spanish only. ||| Brain and Consciousness. ||| Type of Genes T and D
Certainty Principle ||| From the Schrodinger cat to the Ferman's birds ||| The meaning of Dreams
Freely economy ||| Theoricles of Alexandria ||| Rainbow table of elements.||| Satire on the Quantum Mechanics
Cancer and precocious aging ||| Hardware and software of Genetics ||| The farmer and the quantum physicist
Dreams and unconscious logical computing ||| Intelligence and logic ||| How our brain and mind work
Multiverse: multi worlds ||| Biological and Psychological sexuality ||| Genetics: types, aging, sexuality
Genetic development modules ||| Human intelligence source
Andalusian Roof Tile. ||| Rotary Engine. ||| Water motors: Vaporization engines.
Triangular ferman's Houses .||| Pan for frying and poaching eggs ||| The fringed forest
Summary of Hydraulic Chenge Box ||| Ferman fingernails
The Emperor's new clothes and the QM ||| Garbage Triangle: Quantum mechanics, Relativity, Standard theory
Fables and tales of the relativists clocks.||| Nuclei of galaxies.||| Particles accelerators.
Hydrocarbons, water and vital principles on the Earth. ||| Cosmos formula : Metaphysics
Ubiquity Principle of set.||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.
Chaos Fecundity. Symbiosis: from the Chaos to the Evolution.||| Speed-Chords in galaxies.
The ancient planets Asteron and Poseidon.||| The man and the testosterone.||| Toros say ||| The essence of life
Chaos + symbiosis = evolution ||| Future Cosmology: Satire on Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
The stupid tale of the astronaut that did not age ||| Summary of Ferman cosmic vision and models
Climate due to human activity ||| Humans as herd animals||| James Webb telescope: predictions
Vectors and fields of forces ||| Evolution versus Superposition ||| Systems of multiples suns
Importance of magnetic forces in orbital systems ||| Housing Statute
Video Universal Consciousness||| Who is God ||| Faces of God ||| Web Universal consciousness
Creation: Highlights||| First steps in metaphysics ||| A personal experience
Reason for the Cosmos' creation ||| The essence of life ||| Cosmic Entity: Metaphysics and Physics parameters
Metaphysical nature of the Cosmos ||| The Man and his cosmic integration ||| Science versus Religious Faith
Vital Necessity of the Cosmic Entity ||| Creativism: nor creationism, nor determinism ||| When I die
My interest for the cosmology and metaphysics took place almost spontaneously when I was studying the atomic structuring.
The breaking idea was the comprehension of the fourth dimension, and with it, the intelligent principles and consistence in the Cosmos structuring (about 1968). (Metaphysical point at the end)
In a brief period of time I arrived to a quite approximate understanding of many of the basic cosmologic principles on where my current theories lean, such as the fourth dimension, energy, magnetism, etc. and metaphysics basic principles, which are included in the Metaphysics page (at the moment in Spanish) with link in the top.
In 1975 I began to try to disclose my cosmological and metaphysicians theories and during this whole time I have developed complementary concepts in cosmology and chemical structuring, as well as physical and mathematics formulas exposed in the web pages of the top.
I have written several books and summaries of my theories, with object mainly of inscribing them as author, but I have not been able to make public none of them through any means of communication till 2001.
I was born in Casabermeja (Malaga) August 30 1949.
The first nine years of my life I passed them in the countryside (Los Portales, Casabermeja district) with hardly attendance to school, except to be able to make the first communion.
I have been the unique son of my parents and therefore I have not had the company of any brother in my childhood and adolescence.
To my nine years we move (with my family) to the Malaga town where we have lived until the moment and where I have carried out my scarce studies that could be summarized in the following ones:
Three years (from 1959 to 1963) of primary studies until being able to pass to a school of professional formation where in four years (from 1963 to 1967) I acquired the specialty and title in the branch of mechanics of automobile.
Later on I passed to the Industrial School of Technical Engineering where, after two courses, I begin to revise and develop my points of view on the cosmic structuring with works in cosmic and atomic models, mathematics, molecular structuring, metaphysics, etc.
Later on, and for reason lung illnesses, I had to abandon my professional works with different degrees of labour inability, and during this time till now I have continued developing and completing my theoretical works on cosmology, molecular structuring and others.
In 1991 I got married with my wife Ana Maria Frutos Sanchez, not having had any son in our marriage.
During the last thirty years of studies and construction of my cosmic and metaphysical theories, I have been able to check as all the basic principles of the same ones coincide, are complementary and explain in a quite clear way the structuring of the cosmos or universe, so much in its physical part as in its metaphysical one.
It induces me to think that I am a lot of right in my conclusions and so these theories explain how the universe is and how the same one is built.
Likewise in its metaphysical part my theories explain the reason of the human beings' birth, as well as the human relationship and likeness with the cosmos.
For that reason, and being convinced that my cosmological deductions are quite approximate and correct, I am surprised every day that they are not even reviewed or considered by institutions dedicated to astrophysics, cosmology or atomic structuring.
If new theories of unification, cosmology, new physics for particles, etc. that explain and integrate all the cosmic principles are asked for and continually awaited, why do not it is analysed what it is exposed for this purpose in these fields of research?
Now then, starting from 1975 I have been trying to publish and to give to know, year after year, all my theories on cosmology, chemical structuring and mathematics:
- I have tried it with scientific magazines (American Scientist, Nature, Newton, Muy Interesante, American Mathematical Monthly, etc.); also with almost all the information media.
- Also with the University means (more than sixty Universities, mainly to the university of Malaga); more than twenty thousand studious as scientific, university professors, etc.
- With many Physics institutes, particles institutes (CERN, Fermilab, PPARC, etc.), Astrophysics institutes, etc.
Now then, with the irruption of Internet in the media I have had the opportunity to create my own website (starting from 2001), where I can expose my conclusions, although alone they are very summarized.
For these reasons I thank to all those who revise and visit my website and its recommendation if these studies were found interesting.
Later on (starting from 2009 approx.), I have been able to publish some my works (by payment) in few magazines and publications.
Also in several scientific web pages, as can be: Academia.edu, ResearchGate, Internet Archive, Archive.is, Goggle, etc.
Beside this, I will continue attempting and dedicating part of my time to inform and try to get that my works are published and known in the scientific means, because I would not like that in the future my proposals could be "forgotten" neither somebody can adduce "lack of information" on the same ones; neither that in the future can be given dubious positions such as: "really, these theories already existed?"
** Here are some of my thoughts about my theories, works and the ability to present them, after thirty years of research:
"I have had no posibilities, means, power nor time to fight the great dinosaurs of Quantum Mechanics, Relativity and Standard Theory: I simply try to challenge them", with a theory of everything extremely simple and easy that explains all the cosmics foundations.
Although at a high level of scientific institutions, the consideration towards me has been null and I never received even a reply of simple courtesy, on a personal level I have had more luck and from my exposition of my works in the web (from 2001) there has been a sector of cosmology loving such as engineers, studious of different cosmology topics, managers, students, etc., of which I have received support and interest for the development and history through the time of my studies.
I have also received petition of my books or written works, which I never sent because I don't have the opportunity to make any publication, exception of simple copies for inscription as Intellectual Property.
For this reason I have had to remit them to my website. Sorry very much for this circumstance.
Because well, all these people that now (although distant) I consider my friends and before were unknown for me, all they have sent me their support when seeing my pages in the web, which means clearly that their support is completely sincere because it has not been requested previously.
Therefore I thank a lot their interest for my work and their support toward me.
At the same time they have given me enough security in the main topic that infused me many doubts: If my theories were really understood by other persons.
I have seen in the different support samples that are totally comprehensible for almost all, so much fans to the cosmological topics as to the other matters that I expose.
Besides, I have received many positive qualifications.
For everything I feel myself quite satisfied and grateful.
Thank you friends.
Since my youth (around 1968) I thought I understood quite well some fundamentals of the Universe that accompanied me all my life and that I believe were very positive for understanding the cosmos that creates us.
As outlined in the drawing, the cosmos or universe is an intelligent and creative entity that lives its qualities and characteristics through the large-scale creation of everything that exists in this universe.
Therefore for the Cosmic Entity, creating is living and expressing its characteristics and attributions, that is, creating is a "vital necessity" for the Cosmic Entity; just as it is for us.
In the deepest or most essential, the cosmos consists of intelligence and creativity, and even feelings and sensitive.
Both space and time; energy, matter, particles, atoms, stars, etc. it's all outright smart creativity.
We could say that space and time (which are simple intelligent concepts = scenary and movement) would be the first traces of creation, and then with these, the Cosmic Entity will create everything we know, including ourselves.
So, as expressed in the drawing, we are simple creative bodies (soap bubbles) with enough intelligence content to also be able to create by ourselves.
That is, the Cosmic Entity (the girl who makes the soap bubbles) makes her creations (we = the air or soap bubbles stuffed of cosmic intelligence) that we fly and move, to later die and stop using that air or cosmic intelligence that was lent to us by a short period of time.
Therefore it could be said here that:
"Air or cosmic intelligence we are - and in air or cosmic intelligence we will dissolve or integrate newly".
Knowing a little about this, if possible from a young age, is very interesting because we will understand and appreciate almost everything that happens or is created around us at its right value, and we will have the peace of mind that at the end, we will join again to this universal intelligence that contains everything.
About 1968, when I was studying the atomic structure I felt a deep intuition (Si*) that told me that atoms and stars had the same structure and function.
(Si*) Sparkly intuition: Strong intuition/sensation that says us "we are in the correct way".
Logically there must also be levels lower than atoms, and higher than stars.
If this postulate is correct, then the Cosmos is built through a new dimension, the Fourth dimension, where units of any level as can be atoms, unite to form the superior level as they are stars, and so forth toward superior levels.
In contrary sense, atoms should be composed by the union of sub-atoms and so forth toward inferior levels.
If this postulate is correct, (and it seems to be this way), it implies many and important physical and metaphysical consequences.
Apart from the physics theories that my web exposes, it imply very important metaphysical deductions, as can be the following ones:
-- The Cosmos doesn't have any compact element or material; all is a composition of other inferior elements.
-- Although apart from not exist any compact and stable material, the Cosmos is completely stuffed of infinite intelligent and creative elements.
That is, el Cosmos or Universe is an infinite intelligent, sensitive and continuous creation, which to be totally integrated, the Universe forms an intelligent and sensitive Entity.
-- So, if we analyze and obtain the essence of the Cosmos, we alone end up obtaining infinite creativity.
For wherever we look, we will only observe intelligent and sensitive creativity in constant transformation.
When deeper would be our gaze and observation, the deeper will be our feelings of life, admiration and happiness.
But why? Because of creativity is what produces happiness in the cosmos.
Mythologically speaking, the happiness in the Cosmos is the "Happiness of the God/gods when they produce and observe their own cosmic creativity". And we share a little of these cosmic capabilities.
But then, what are we?
- Because the same: A developed creation with certain capacity of creativity, although in a small scale.
Say, by observation and assimilation, we are a small compendium of the qualities that surrounding us, getting this way properties that the Cosmos has.
Then, we can go obtaining the qualities and consciousness of the cosmic self and go passing from the consciousness of a simple animal to having and enlarging our awareness of the cosmic entity.
Very important question, because we will go passing from animal defects, fears and disadvantages to the advantages of the cosmic consciousness towards which we walk.
The cosmic consciousness is very good for us because of it allows us to be more and more unite to the timeless Cosmos and go forgetting the sad and poor animal existence.
It is very different to feel like a simple mortal animal, than to feel like an immortal cosmic entity.
(i.e. What can my death matter, if my spirit and consciousness is linked and felt the same than the cosmic consciousness?
So the path and purpose of the intelligent beings seems to be of being transformed more and more into beings with cosmic intelligence and sensitivity, acquiring with it a cosmic consciousness each time bigger.
Then friends, encourage !!!, and let us go into the rich, wide and rewarding cosmic consciousness.
And finally, already situated in 2022, I feel like expressing some complaint towards some large scientific establishments (such as Cern, Fermilab, universities, etc.) and various scientific media, which ignore and eliminate any information that I can contribute about this Theory. I understand that it is because it does not fit current relativistic and quantum "teachings".
And of course, I should provide some reasons for the protest:
These reasons are simple, that during all these 40 years my Everything Theory has been justified day after day with all the tests and observations that are being carried out.
However, the great scientific establishments and their magnificent doctors of science seem to like living in a sea of confusion more than listening to ideas from individuals much less important than them, "possibly because of it would seem humiliating".
Greetings to all you.