Black Holes cannot exist
Of ferman: Fernando Mancebo Rodriguez--- Personal page. ----Spanish pages
Video: Cosmic and atomic model
Double slit and camera obscura experiments: ferman experiment ||| Type of Waves: Questions of Quantum Mechanics
The socurces of gravity. ||| In favour of the cosmos theory of ferman FCM ||| Theory of Everything: summary
Model of Cosmos. ||| Atomic model ||| Development speed of forces.||| Magnets: N-S magnetic polarity.
Stellar molecules ||| Static and Dynamic chaos||| Inversion or Left-right proof ||| Scheme approach TOE
Chart of atomic measures||| The main foundations of the Cosmos' Structure ||| Unstable particles in accelerators
Short summary atomic model ||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.||| Mathematical cosmic model based on Pi.
Inexactness principle in observations ||| Einstein and the gravity ||| The Universal Motion ||| Atomic particles
Cosmic Geometry ||| Bipolar electronic: semiconductors ||| Multiverse or multi-worlds||| Light and photons
Quantum explanation of Gravity ||| Real physics versus virtual physics ||| The window experiment
Atomic Density ||| Linkin: Coeficients Lcf Mcf ||| Atomic nuclei structuring: Short summary
Few points about Cosmic Structuring.||| What is Time||| Simultaneity ||| The Cosmic tree ||| The Cosmic entropy
Interesting and short life of neutrons ||| Leptons field ||| Macro Microcosm, the same thing.
Fourth dimension of space.||| The way to get a unity theory||| UHECR Ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rays
Magnetic or entropy forces: types or classes||| Time observation and time emission ||| The universe expansion
Planetary Mechanics : Short summary ||| Easy explanation of the Planetary model||| State and type of Particles
Higgs boson and fields: wrong way ||| The positron proof: main types of magnetic fields
Current state of cosmology ||| Electromagnetic charges: reason and procedure ||| Neutron: The short and interesting life of
Type of Magnetic Forces ||| The big-bang and Universe' expansion ||| Astronomical chart: Astros, asteroids and microids
Certainty Principle: easy explanation ||| Certainty Principle and the Schrodinger's Cat ||| Wave function collapse
Relativity versus QM ||| The non-curvature of space by matter ||| The Master Clock
Ferman's light analysis ||| Cosmos basic elements, summary||| Comparative numbers in double slit experiment
Stars dimensions ||| Orbital situation of electrons ||| Bright cores versus Black holes
Summary of Ferman cosmic vision and models ||| Atomic nuclei similar to stars ||| Stationary time, but not local neither relativist
Neutrinos versus background radiation ||| Saturn says no to Einstein curvature.||| Da: Average density of energy in the cosmos
| Gravity versus magnetic fields of force
Radial coordinates.||| Physical and mathematical sets theory. | Algebraic product of sets.
Planar angles: Trimetry.||| Fractions: natural portions.||| Cosmic spiral ||| Inverse values of parameters and operation
Equivalence and commutive property of division. ||| Concepts and Numbers. ||| Bend coefficient of curves ||| Mathematical dimensions
Transposition property ||| Accumulated product: Powers ||| Dimensional Geometry: Reversibility
Priority Rule in powers and roots ||| The decimal counter ||| The floating point index ||| Paradoxes in mathematics
Direct formula for Pi: The Squaring Pi. ||| The pyramids of Squaring Pi. ||| Functions of Pi ||| Integration formulas Pi.
Squaring the Circle ||| Cocktail formula for Squaring Pi.||| Orbital coordinates in motion: Summary
Oscillating function: Cartesian oscillators ||| The ciclo as unit of angular speed ||| Squaring circles ruler and compass |||
Video: Squaring circles ruler and compass ||| The number Phi and the circumference.speed |||
The The extended Pi ||| Angles trisection||| Squaring the Circle regarding Phi||| Video of the two squares method
Discusion about the Pi as transcendental number|||: Not transcendental Pi||| The chained sets|||
Properties of equalities in limits||| The Phi right triangles ||| Pi and the Circumscription Theorem
Pi triangle by squaring the circle : Vedeo Pi triangle ||| Squaring Pi demonstration by circumscription Theorem LatexPdf
Doubling the cube ||| Framing the circle ||| Phi and Pi: relation formula
Squaring circle with Phi (to 0.000005 of ideal ruler and compass)||| Sbits: Static and dynamic orbital coordinates
Spherical molecules. ||| Genetic Heredity. ||| Metaphysics: Spanish only. ||| Brain and Consciousness. ||| Type of Genes T and D
Certainty Principle ||| From the Schrodinger cat to the Ferman's birds ||| The meaning of Dreams
Freely economy ||| Theoricles of Alexandria ||| Rainbow table of elements.||| Satire on the Quantum Mechanics
Cancer and precocious aging ||| Hardware and software of Genetics ||| The farmer and the quantum physicist
Dreams and unconscious logical computing
Andalusian Roof Tile. ||| Rotary Engine. ||| Water motors: Vaporization engines.
Triangular ferman's Houses .||| Pan for frying and poaching eggs ||| The fringed forest
Summary of Hydraulic Chenge Box ||| Ferman fingernails
The Emperor's new clothes and the QM ||| Garbage Triangle: Quantum mechanics, Relativity, Standard theory
Fables and tales of the relativists clocks.||| Nuclei of galaxies.||| Particles accelerators.
Hydrocarbons, water and vital principles on the Earth. ||| Cosmos formula : Metaphysics
Ubiquity Principle of set.||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.
Chaos Fecundity. Symbiosis: from the Chaos to the Evolution.||| Speed-Chords in galaxies.
The ancient planets Asteron and Poseidon.||| The man and the testosterone.||| Toros say ||| The essence of life
Chaos + symbiosis = evolution ||| Future Cosmology: Satire on Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
The stupid tale of the astronaut that did not age
Video Universal Consciousness||| Who is God ||| Web Universal consciousness
Creation: Highlights||| First steps in metaphysics ||| A personal experience
Reason for the Cosmos' creation
Black Holes cannot exist
In the drawings of this article, the impossibility of the existence of black holes is exposed and explained, in a synthesized way, due to the supposed high mass and gravity that make them up (and therefore energy density), are not allowed by the force of expansion and redistribution of energy (magnetic forces of expansion) that the Cosmos produces and exerts throughout the cosmic space (according to my cosmic and atomic model).
The Cosmos as a whole is completely filled and saturated by cosmic energy (space + universal movement (time)).
This cosmic energy fills the entire cosmos, and then, it behaves like a fluid in a container, and therefore exerts a powerful energy redistribution force in the same proportion in all places of the cosmos or Universe (magnetic force).
And this takes place in all places and at all cosmic levels (microcosm and macrocosm)
Well, if there is an average energy density in the cosmos, it should have a Da value (mean energy density) at all points in cosmic space.
Although, this average value of the energy density can be "mocked" and increased with the construction of orbital systems (nucleus with high energy density and periphery with high volume and low concentration of matter) such as atoms, stellar systems , etc., with an average value of energy density in the whole system already allowed by the cosmos.
However, due to the cohesion and compression of these orbital systems when they rotate, there comes a time when they clearly exceed the energy density, and due to the action of the magnetic forces of expansion, and then these systems are destroyed and divided into other minor systems and particles (Uranium, supernovae).
That is, the exploding supernovae do not become black holes, (nor do these black holes exist), they simply destroy themselves forming stars and smaller particles.
Of course, the Big-bang did not exist as a great concentration of energy either, but as a great concentration of matter that exploded emitting all kinds of stars and smaller particles.
Nor does the space of the cosmos expand, but the stars and particles resulting from our great explosion or Big-bang.
I would not like to be killjoy or pessimistic, but what I see is not a black hole as it is theorized, (It would have to be a completely dark and symmetrical centre, with an equator and a large accretion disk also symmetrical, uniform and very extensive (ring-shaped) with thousands of stars revolving around it).
Then, this just looks like three simple stars (three star system) which revolve around each other.
I think it doesn't look anything like a black hole, and it's not to disqualify the observation work of these scientists, it's just that I see it that way.
So this deep, long and extensive research work can we consider it a great failure?
Not, quite the opposite: What this great work seems to show is that black holes do not exist.
If we look for them with great precision, detail, care, etc. and I can't find them, maybe they don't exist.
So where is the problem?
Well, probably in that the preponderance of Relativity induces and "forces" scientists of all kinds to make formulas, demonstrations and observations that justify Relativity; never contradict it:
Of course, if they want to be heard.
Thank you friends