Well friends, although the topic is a bit repetitive, I find it serious enough to insist on it.
And the topic is the Uncertainty Principle that is clearly false and manipulative, which, it is demonstrated daily in particle accelerators: "Particles (energy, mass, momentum, etc.) are measured by observing their changes in motion within a set field".
Momentum Principle: ""There is no possibility of finding or measuring the momentum of a particle without knowing its location and the changes in location (to find the speed) of this particle. ""
And the more exact we adjust these changes of situation in time (speed), the greater the accuracy will be in the adjustments of the momentum.
We will not ask, then why is QM so interested in imposing the opposite?
Simply, to hide contradiction and incongruous, because when these contradictions occur in its postulates and observations, we excuse and justify ourselves by saying: "That is due to the Uncertainty Principle, by which we cannot know exactly what happens at those cosmic levels."
I understand that this is a scientific impudence (*), of which not only its promoters are guilty, but all of us, that when being aware, we do not have the courage to contradict them.
(*) Introduce a physical principle or postulate, knowing and being verified by observations and deductions that it is wrong.

The trick:

I believe that Heisenberg was honest in his deductions, but once proven incorrect, QM would no longer be honourable for continuing to rely on this Principle.
And where is the trick to make us believe in the Uncertainty Principle?
Because of very simple, doing a conjurer's trick, making us look at the hand (right) where it has nothing, to put in the rabbit with the other hand (left) with which has caught it.
Right hand):
"" If we throw a photon at an electron, it loses its state and we can no longer measure it "". (Simple Trick)
Left hand):
But if we have any chance of measuring the momentum of the electron we have to do it on its position (left hand) and always measuring its position and position changes.
That is, let us first measure the momentum, and thus we will also have the position: (Correct Method).