Planetary mechanics

* Planetary mechanics can be considered as an essential part of my cosmic and atomic theory (TOE) since in planetary mechanics the development of most of the cosmic model principles occurs.

Now, to review schematically what planetary mechanics is, we should expose as synthesized as possible the basic elements of cosmic structuring to see how these elements are later joined to develop this mechanics.
So let's start with the most basic elements.
In the cosmos there are two basic principles for its construction:
Space and the Universal Movement.
Both would be quasi-metaphysical and quasi-physical elements, that is, they unite the creative and intelligent essence of the cosmos, with its creative and practical part of it.
-Space, we already know it and it can be considered as the place or stage where the entire cosmic structure will be built.
-The universal movement is an element not considered until now, but as one of its structural elements and its measurement is time, because we are going to name it in its place.
Thus, as basic elements we would have space and time.
Each of these elements separately does not produce anything, but together they already begin to create the entire cosmos.
Space and time united and acting together, already produce and manifest us as cosmic energy, which is present and acts in all places of the cosmos.
That is, cosmic energy equal to space-time acting as movement and energetic impulse throughout the entire Universe.

However and in principle the cosmic energy is canceled in all directions, except in the concentric direction toward any point of the cosmos, this being the only way to add and concentrate the cosmic energy that is spread out and distributed throughout the cosmos.
Well, this is what gravity is all about.
Gravity.-
Gravity = cosmic energy in concentric action on any point in cosmic space.
Now, since gravity is energy of action and concentric movement, this means that the different points with this property can mutually attract each other and form conglomerates of energy points, which by joining each other create matter.
Magnetic Force.-
As points and conglomerates of matter are created, a great concentration and pressure of energy is produced at these material points.
And similar to fluid, which it is, concentrated cosmic energy tends to expand and spread around it with less energy density.
Reason why a pressure force is born for the redistribution of energy that is simply the magnetic force that every concentration of matter produces around it.
Later and when rotating the magnetic fields around the material nuclei, these fields produce magnetic orbits and gravitational layers that will be the ones that structure the atoms and stars.
Well, to make a synthesis of this planetary mechanics, we are going to present drawings (atom: Carbon) and simple formulas of the atomic and stellar structuring

Here we represent the cosmic spiral, which would define the distance between orbits (Pi/2)^n, where n is the ordered number of orbits, in which 1 is the first orbital, 2 the second, etc.
Being N the last orbital, which also defines the atomic radius.

Here we represent the coefficients of dimensional relation between levels, for example between atoms and stars.
The longitudinal coefficient is represented, (for example, radii) and the coefficient of relation between masses (atomic mass - star mass)
The speeds between levels are the same one due to the fact that space and time have the same differential between levels, and therefore the velocity that is space divided by time (v= s/t), they also conserve the same proportion between levels.
For example, taking the equivalent atom (neon) to our solar system, and multiplying its mass by 2Pi x 10^55 we would have the mass of our solar system:
Solar system mass = neon mass x (6.28 x 10^55)
(33.51 x 10^-24 g) x (6.28 x 10^55) = 2.1 x 10^33 g
Neon radius = solar system radius / (6.28 x 10^22):
(5.2 x 10^12 m) / (6.28 x 10^22) = 0.83 10^-10 m.
Neon nucleus diameter = (Sun diameter) / (6.28 x 10^22):
(1.4 x 10^9 m) / (6.28 x 10^22) = 2.22 x 10^-14 m

Here is exposed a representative diagram of the cosmic levels with their level coefficient in longitudinal dimension.
And below scheme with formulas related to atomic dimensions with which we can obtain, among others, the atomic and stellar dimensions as detailed in the atomic dimensions chart at the end of this summary; and also physical-mathematical concepts as mathematical unit of atomic radius, mathematical unit of atomic mass, atomic density, molecular porosity, etc.

As we can deduce from the previous formulas, both in large stars and in atoms, the great cohesion and compression of their gravitational layers and magnetic orbits will cause them to be integrated and absorbed by the atomic and stellar nuclei, leaving only the outer layers .
That is, both atoms and stars possibly only had about 20-30 orbitals only.

Small criticism of the QM.

And finally, forgive me for a personal criticism of QM (Quantum Mechanics).
I have a hard time accepting the strange and incomprehensible orbital distribution that QM proposes.
I understand that the cosmos is spherical, rotational, and does not use quadratures like our mind does when using Cartesian coordinates.
In the cosmos no elements are observed or distributed on the x, y, z axes.
How do we think that an atomic nucleus is going to distribute the electrons on the x, y, z axes, when these axes do not exist there!. *
It is the same as if we tried to distribute the planets of our solar system, or the stars of the galaxies in Cartesian coordinates around their nuclei or centers.
It lacks all sense and logic.
In the cosmos the basic movements of the elements are always rotational and orbital in order to compensate and balance the pair of antagonistic fields of forces such as gravity and the magnetic force that every material nucleus produces.
As we see in the cosmos, when a nuclear center is formed with a potential of energy and forces of any kind, this nucleus distributes the elements that it handles in orbits, some closer and others more distant, but in Cartesian coordinates, never.
And all these orbits in rotation around the nucleus to counteract (centrifugal and centripetal forces) the nuclear attraction on the orbital elements (electrons, planets; stars in galaxies, etc.)
Forgetting that there is a mutual attraction between nucleus and orbitals, and saying that there is a certain possibility of finding them in this or that place simply for our formulas to be correct (Schrodinger) is not scientifically serious, a circumstance that leads us to such a disaster as is the Orbital layout of the QM.
But also, the distribution that the QM gives to the orbitals is so crazy, strange and unfortunate, that I understand that for a critical mind it is almost impossible to assimilate it.
So when I look at a quantum orbital exposure table, I feel puzzled, confused, and even angry.
Sorry, but I don't agree with the QM.

This cosmic model considers that both atomic nuclei and stars produce magnetic and gravitational fields around them, and when the nuclei and their fields rotate, they are forced to deform into a spiral way and form gravitational layers (valence layers) and electro-magnetic orbits.
Both one and the other tend to be completed, that is, the magnitude or mass of the nucleus defines the potential and dimensions (radius) that the orbits and gravitational layers must occupy.
(* All this to conserve the energy entropy of the cosmos "at so much occupied volume - so much energy contained")

Simplifying, we would say that atoms have two structural needs to satisfy:
1.- Complete the (positive) electromagnetic orbits with electrons, thus defining the atomic dimensions and energy density balance to which the cosmos as a whole forces them (cosmic entropy = so much volume occupied - so much energy contained)
2.- Complete its gravitational layers 2.(2N^2) = 2, 8,8,18,18,32,32 to get a complete gravitational balance.
And precisely this need to be complete and occupied the magnetic orbits and valence layers is what makes all atoms (except the noble gases that are already complete and saturated their orbits and layers) tend to form atomic and molecular bonds to complete their layers.
Well, in this cosmic and atomic model, the orbits consist of rotational or planetary movements on the central nucleus, and to achieve the atomic or molecular unions (it also occurs in stars) the atoms and stars have to be located keeping the magnetic polarity N_S and thus construct covalent orbits for two or more atoms, as seen in the drawing.
* In the following drawing, the rainbow table of the elements is exposed so that the different chemical elements, their orbits and their layers can be visually studied.
Besides, and to resemble the planetary theory, they are distributed in concentric gravitational semi-layers (with the orbits corresponding to each one of them ... 2,8,8,18,18,32 ..) on the atomic nucleus.

Below, I expose table of atomic measures:
Separation is the distance among atomic nuclei in any material.

The three-dimensional property of space means that cosmic energy can develop and act in a concentric way on any point in space, this concentric action taking the shape and denomination of gravity.
And it is this gravity that gathers, concentrates and condenses the cosmic energy points to transform them into matter.
Therefore matter are conglomerates of energy points produced or driven by gravity.
After, these points of energy and matter continue to be accumulated and concentrated by gravity to build the particles, which can be of any size and dimension.
To form atoms, these particles go from sub-atoms* (about 10^-80 grams) to atoms (about 10^-24 grams), with subatomic particles of any dimension between these two limits.
Then each particle creates its own gravitational and magnetic fields; and the latter create the different magnetic and electromagnetic potentials that are exposed in a previous drawing.
* Sub-atoms are units of the lower level than atoms, but with the same structure and fundamentals.

Below we see some groups in which we can distribute the subatomic particles.

Thank you friends