The two Basic elements of the Cosmos: Space + Universal Motion (with its time parameter).

None of the specific particles in the Standard Model exist; There are only nuclei or particles of amorphous or compact matter, which if accumulated in large nuclei (in density) produce magnetic fields and positive orbits, which attract smaller material particles and structure or form orbital systems: (nucleus with satellites orbiting around it).
Foundations of electromagnetic charges:
-- Any lone large particle produce magnetic fields and positive orbits around them, with which they tend to form orbital systems (nucleus with N orbitals).
-- Every particle will be neutral if it has the necessary and correct orbital ones (ra = rN);
-- It will be positive if they do not have enough orbital ones (Ra > rN);
-- And it will be negative if it has too many orbitals ( Ra < rN).
Ra = atomic radius; and rN = radius of the last orbital.

-- * With this, we can already begin to intuit that the matter-antimatter dilemma is fictitious: there are only particles of any dimension with different charges.
Particles smaller than atoms follow the same rules, as to their electromagnetic charges. (ie. electron/positron; muon/antimuon, etc., are not matter/antimatter, but the same particles with different charges, depending on the number of contained orbital: In these cases neutrinos)

Friends, I have tried to summarize as simply as possible a great problem or confusion in the knowledge of the Cosmos in which we are immersed (in my opinion) mainly due to the application of theories quite far removed from this cosmic reality.
And I do it with a simple comparative drawing of the macro and microcosms, which would be enlarged copies ones of another: stars (macrocosms) as enlarged copies of atoms (microcosms).
Thus, the stars have the same elements, parameters, structural physical laws, etc. than atoms.
Of course, a question would immediately arise: And why are we so far from that cosmic resemblance?
Well, simply because we are giving us, some theories (distant and unconnected between them) that prevent us from even thinking or suggesting such a similarity between the microcosm and the macrocosm.
* It is similar to if we are getting deeper and deeper into the desert (to the east), when in fact the oasis is to the west.
In my opinion we are suggested and a little hypnotized with these somewhat (and sometimes a lot) imaginary theories.
And what are these physical theories so far from reality?
They are Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and partly, the Standard Model.
Of course it is my thought and point of view, but I think I have a duty to expose it, because the problem is serious.

Reply to my friend John Padinjarekutt:

All these microparticles (electrons, neutrons, protons, neutrinos, etc.) are sub-atomic particles made up of matter, but which in turn are divisible, almost infinitely, since they occupy a place in space, and space is infinitely divisible.
Quantum Mechanics will deal with these particles, but applying its own (and largely erroneous) formulas.
The first thing it does is to substitute the actual physical particles by waves, by substituting the mass of the particles for wave frequencies, and giving a unit of mass-energy by a constant, Planck's constant h.
e= (m.v^2)/2 = h.f
So we can say that for example a train, we can measure it as a very high frequency wave whose energy would be e = h.f, where f would be an enormous frequency.
And we can do the same with all the particles, replace them with waves through this procedure.
That's not really true, but we don't care, we can ramble in that way, that is, we are rambling in waves instead of compact particles.
But, rambling, rambling, we reach extremes as unfortunate as the distribution of orbitals by means of a Cartesian Coordinate system, a procedure that does not occur in the real Cosmos, but in our undulating mind.
Let's say that our mind is Cartesian, on the contrary, the Cosmos works in the form of rotational orbital systems.
Therefore Quantum Mechanics can sometimes approach reality, but being a mental mathematical abstraction, in most cases it is wrong and even becomes a bit ridiculous as in the case of the distribution of orbitals.

Friends, as we are celebrating the anniversary of the discovery of the Higgs Boson, let me write down some predictions about it, and according to my model.

1.- There are no completely equal quantum particles, but rather extensive ranges of particles with similar properties, but with some variation in size between them.
*I put a simple and rough example:
Let us think that the atoms, at our level, represent the fruits.
Well, there are many types of fruits (atoms), pears, apples, bananas, etc., but within each type (e.g. apple) we will not find two completely identical apples, despite being of the same type.
In the drawing, there are the groups of particles that my model makes.

2.- The Higgs Bosons, like other particles, are simply ranges of unstable particles of similar (but not equal) sizes.
This means that more and more particles of sizes similar to the current Higgs Bosons will be discovered.

3.- The Higgs Bosons, it will be shown that they do not have the capacity to give mass to other particles, and that they are simple pieces of matter of different sizes.

4.- It will also be discovered that the (unstable) Higgs Bosons are normally positive in their charge, and that they will quickly transform into (stable) atoms of size (in matter and mass) similar to the mass of the Boson.

5.- Logically, all unstable particles (especially the larger ones) tend to become stable forming orbital systems, with the energy density required by the cosmos Da.

Really! So why is it said that there are so many particles, and more and more are being discovered every day?
Easy, because it began by applying erroneous ideas such as that the nucleus contains lot of positive charges, and to explain that they remain together we needed more and more new particles: Gluons, neutrons, multiple protons, quarks, antiquarks, etc. etc.
But no: nuclei are just amorphous matter, more or less compacted by gravity.
-- The charges are on the periphery, in the magnetic orbits.

(** Friends, I am sorry to be tiresome and boring, but since observations and proofs that my cosmic and atomic model are correct continue to be produced, therefore I am forced to expose these coincidences).
Good, in my cosmic model this phenomenon is exposed, which is neither more nor less than a radioactive phenomenon at the level of stars.
That is, both atoms and stars have the same elements, the same structure and the same cosmic laws and rules.
In this case, like a large radioactive atom, this star has emitted a particle (an enormous amount of nuclear mass) because it is a star with too much energy density and is forced to emit high nuclear or solar radiation: Everything similar to the atomic behaviour of large radioactive atoms.

Friends, some of you already know my thoughts and model on cosmic creation, which is based on:
""" The Cosmos is based on a totally intelligent, logical and sensitive structuring (Which today is, simplified, cold and poorly defined by cosmologists as: "Information")"""
Well, here I put very simplified the beginning of the cosmic structure with the drawing and short text that follows:
-------------------
By uniting Space and Universal Movement (both, physical and metaphysical concepts), this is redistributed and manifests as rectilinear motion towards all cosmic directions.
In principle, it would seem that by occupying and moving each line through a different place in space, they could not unite or form a sum of forces and energies in the Cosmos.
But it was not like that, since being three-dimensional space, any point of space M would receive lines of force that are directed towards it from all directions, and these all lines that are directed towards point M as they occupy less and less space , are added and integrated into a set of lines of concentric forces on the point M.
Well, all these lines integrated in a set and on a point M, is what forms the points M of energy and matter of the Cosmos.
Afterwards and due to the mutual attraction that they entail (gravitation) they accumulate in all kinds of particles.
Structural Magnetic Forces: Every line of gravity (concentric, of integration and cohesion in matter), once it crosses this matter nuclei, becomes expansive or redistributive of matter, that is, in the magnetic forces, which when rotating the nuclei, create fields and magnetic orbits where they capture and hold the orbitals.

Friends, I would like to expose my cosmic and atomic model in a simple way, beginning with the basic elements in the structuring of the Cosmos.
My conclusions are that the Cosmos or Universe has eminently metaphysical principles, that is to say, that from a purely metaphysical intelligence and sensitivity (which in cosmic science is now called, in a poor and concise way as "information"), it is created a structure of primary physical elements, which successively united and structured among them, gives us all the cosmic creation that we know.
Well, since our study will be eminently cosmic physics, we expose the two basic elements that begin to structure the Universe.
These two basic elements with the Space and the Universal Motion.

1.- The Space.
The concept of space is easy to assimilate, since it is before our eyes and we visualize and understand it as the place or setting where all the physical and cosmic events that we continuously discover take place.

2.- The Universal Motion
The Universal Motion (UM), however, is a primary physical element, which being continually in our sight, we have not been able or aware of giving it the real physical value it has.
We usually replace it with time, to which if we give a physical value of the first magnitude.
But no, time is just a measurement parameter of Universal Motion (UM), similar to what length would be as a unit of measurement for space.
We see the potential and quality of the UM in each and every one of the cosmic elements: Nothing is still, everything moves continuously, because everything is made up of Universal Motion (UM).

3.- Union: Space + Universal Motion
Now, for the construction and structuring of the Cosmos it is necessary that the Space and the UM be united, because separated from each other nothing is built, nor does anything exist.
So that supposed Metaphysical Foundation of the Cosmos unites Space and UM, forming an element composed of both and with the properties of both.
But what would be that result of said union?
Well, in good logic they would be a continuous movement throughout the cosmic space of that universal movement, which will translate into lines of movement in all directions and directions through and throughout the cosmic space.
And of course, to those lines of movement occupying and acting throughout the cosmos, they would translate or act as an energy or force of thrust and movement in all places and towards all directions of space.
And we will call this energy and force of movement as Cosmic Energy, present and active throughout the entire cosmic space.

4.- Cosmic energy: Dark Energy or Ether.
Well, cosmic energy at first may seem to have a serious problem, because if it is redistributed throughout the cosmos, and in all directions, it could not be added or form sets of energy or force and only that well redistributed cosmic energy would be appreciated. and with an invariant mean energy density throughout the cosmos.
But we were lucky and it is not like that:
And it is not because of the three-dimensional properties of space.
If we look at any point P in space, infinite lines (or radii) will approach it concentrically from all its surroundings.
Well, if you are concentric lines that approach any point in space, since they are already lines of force or movement, as they approach that centre or point P they integrate and add up in a set of concentric forces and movement on that central P.
That is to say, in principle any point P in space can become a concentric point of cosmic energy, by the sum of all the lines of energy that approach it.
And as we will see, with these points, and their ability to unite with each other, conglomerates of cosmic energy points can be formed.

5.- Gravity.
As we have just seen, Gravity is simply that form of action of the Cosmic Energy, which, acting concentrically, can become compact and autonomous points of energy, and with the capacity to attract others, and accumulate and add successively between them.
Then Gravity is simply the action of the Cosmic Energy in its concentric form on any point in space.

6.- Matter and its mass.
We have also verified that cosmic energy, in its concentric action on any point in the form of gravitational forces, can in turn attract and accumulate other equal points of concentric cosmic energy and form ever greater accumulations of these points of cosmic energy.
And these accumulations of energy points is what we call matter: the greater the accumulation of energy points, the greater the amount of matter accumulated there.
These accumulations of points of energy or matter are what we can call material particles, which can be larger or smaller depending on how large this accumulation is.
But what would then be the mass of any material particles?
Well, as we guessed, it is simply the amount of matter (and therefore energy) that a particle has accumulated. Therefore, mass = amount of matter in a particle.
And how do we measure the mass of a particle?
Simply by the force of attraction between them
-- If we establish some units of mass (g = gram) within a given gravitational field (G = gravity of the earth) within this field of terrestrial gravity we can, by gravitational attraction, measure the masses of all other particles.

7.- Magnetic fields and forces
Let us think of a great accumulation of matter forming an important material nucleus.
A question that would immediately arise might be:
Well, and when the lines of cosmic or gravitational energy that go to that center (or material nucleus) go through it and come out the other side of said nucleus, what happens to them?
Well, they act in the opposite way, that is, instead of forces of accumulation, cohesion and compression, they become forces of expansion and redistribution of matter.
That is to say, when an important material nucleus is formed, initially some gravitational fields of cohesion and compression of the matter are formed on the nucleus, but at the same time, and at its exit through the opposite side of the nucleus, some force fields are created. magnets that try to redistribute matter.
* An important issue to point out here is that in large material nuclei both forces (gravitational and magnetic) are compensated in their potential, since they are the same forces but with different actions when entering the nucleus, and when leaving it.

8.- Electromagnetic charges.
We have seen the two types of forces and their fields: gravitational and magnetic.
One of the primary results of the existence of these two antagonistic fields of energy and force is the need to find a certain compensation and balance, for which the nucleus proceeds immediately to its rotation, thus avoiding a greater compression of the nuclear masses.
With this rotation of the nucleus and its fields (faster closer to the nucleus) they also produce a spiral deformation of the fields, both gravitational and magnetic; and in the orbital cuts (cut of the nuclear radius with the spirals in deformation of the fields) a stationary orbits of balance are produced, very appropriate for the situation of orbitals in rotation around the nucleus.
Well, these stationary orbits will be the positive (+) orbits that will attract, place and keep the orbitals rotating around the nucleus.
So we have already seen that all important material accumulation consists of a nucleus with a great gravitational potential, and also consists of a peripheral field with a great magnetic potential with perfectly defined orbits and positively charged (+) So here comes another question.
How big the magnetic fields are, and how many positively charged orbits they contain.
Well, it depends on the magnitude and matter of the nucleus, and that we explain below.

9.- Average energy density in the Cosmos.
We see at the beginning that all the cosmic energy is redistributed in equal proportion (density) throughout the cosmic space.
We will call this average density of energy contained in the Cosmos as Da. (Average energy density in the Cosmos).
And this average energy density Da, is going to tell us what will be the appropriate dimensions of each orbital system (nucleus with its orbits occupied by orbitals).
And the adequate dimension or volume of the orbital system will be the one that gives us the average density Da that the Cosmos as a whole has and requires.
In other words, Da = mass of the system / volume of the system.
Now, what happens if the system has fewer occupied orbits than are necessary to achieve that Da?
Well, the system as a whole will have a positive charge.
And that if what it has are more occupied orbits than necessary, then the charge of the system as a whole will be negative.

10.- Thus, the final electromagnetic charges of an orbital system will be given by the following relationship:
Foundations of electromagnetic charges:
-- Any lone large particle produce magnetic fields and positive orbits around them, with which they tend to form orbital systems (nucleus with N orbitals).
-- Every particle will be neutral if it has the necessary and correct orbital ones (ra = rN);
-- It will be positive if they do not have enough orbital ones (Ra > rN);
-- And it will be negative if it has too many orbitals ( Ra < rN).
Ra = atomic radius; and rN = radius of the last orbital.

Thank you friends