Of ferman: Fernando Mancebo Rodriguez--- Personal page.
You can see many of my works, in the following pages:
COSMIC and ATOMIC MODEL ||| Video: Cosmic and atomic model
Double slit and camera obscura experiments: ferman experiment ||| Type of Waves: Questions of Quantum Mechanics
The socurces of gravity. ||| In favour of the cosmos theory of ferman FCM ||| Theory of Everything: summary
Model of Cosmos. ||| Development speed of forces.||| Magnets: N-S magnetic polarity.
Stellar molecules ||| Static and Dynamic chaos||| Inversion or Left-right proof ||| Scheme approach TOE
Chart of atomic measures||| The main foundations of the Cosmos' Structure ||| Unstable particles in accelerators
Short summary atomic model ||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.||| Mathematical cosmic model based on Pi.
Inexactness principle in observations ||| Einstein and the gravity ||| The Universal Motion ||| Atomic particles
Cosmic Geometry ||| Bipolar electronic: semiconductors ||| Multiverse or multi-worlds||| Light and photons
Quantum explanation of Gravity ||| Real physics versus virtual physics ||| The window experiment
Atomic Density ||| Linkin: Coeficients Lcf Mcf ||| Atomic nuclei structuring: Short summary
Few points about Cosmic Structuring.||| What is Time||| Simultaneity ||| The Cosmic tree ||| The Cosmic entropy
Interesting and short life of neutrons ||| Leptons field ||| Macro Microcosm, the same thing.
Fourth dimension of space.||| The way to get a unity theory||| UHECR Ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rays
Magnetic or entropy forces: types or classes||| Time observation and time emission ||| The universe expansion
Planetary Mechanics : Short summary ||| Easy explanation of the Planetary model||| State and type of Particles
Higgs boson and fields: wrong way ||| The positron proof: main types of magnetic fields ||| The gravity proof
Current state of cosmology ||| Electromagnetic charges: reason and procedure ||| Neutron: The short and interesting life of
Type of Magnetic Forces ||| The big-bang and Universe' expansion ||| Astronomical chart: Astros, asteroids and microids
Certainty Principle: easy explanation ||| Certainty Principle and the Schrodinger's Cat ||| Wave function collapse
Relativity versus QM ||| The non-curvature of space by matter ||| The Master Clock
Ferman's light analysis ||| Cosmos basic elements, summary||| Comparative numbers in double slit experiment
Stars dimensions ||| Orbital situation of electrons ||| Bright cores versus Black holes
Summary of Ferman cosmic vision and models ||| Atomic nuclei similar to stars ||| Stationary time, but not local neither relativist
Neutrinos versus background radiation ||| Saturn says no to Einstein curvature.||| Da: Average density of energy in the cosmos
Gravity versus magnetic fields of force ||| Black holes cannot exist||| Expansion of materials by energy
Particles in accelerators: almost infinite ||| Trans-dimensional or ideal loupe||| 4D of space, time and matter
5D x 6D = Universal motion x time = Cosmic energy ||| The six cosmic dimensions
Neutrinos ||| Nature of light ||| Hydrogen atom ||| Uncertainty principle: test||| Criticism to Quantum M
Invariance Principle of Time ||| Stuffing forces and heat particles||| Physical waves and imaginary waves
Higgs fields and bosons: Imaginary elements||| Higgs bosons predictions||| Exotic particles
Stars as copies of atoms ||| ERF: Energy rebalancing forces||| Big Bang reality
Radial coordinates.||| Physical and mathematical sets theory. | Algebraic product of sets.
Planar angles: Trimetry.||| Fractions: natural portions.||| Cosmic spiral ||| Inverse values of parameters and operation
Equivalence and commutive property of division. ||| Concepts and Numbers. ||| Bend coefficient of curves ||| Mathematical dimensions
Transposition property ||| Accumulated product: Powers ||| Dimensional Geometry: Reversibility
Priority Rule in powers and roots ||| The decimal counter ||| The floating point index ||| Paradoxes in mathematics
Direct formula for Pi: The Squaring Pi. ||| The pyramids of Squaring Pi. ||| Functions of Pi ||| Integration formulas Pi.
Squaring the Circle ||| Cocktail formula for Squaring Pi.||| Orbital coordinates in motion: Summary
Oscillating function: Cartesian oscillators ||| The ciclo as unit of angular speed ||| Squaring circles ruler and compass |||
Video: Squaring circles ruler and compass ||| The number Phi and the circumference.speed |||
The The extended Pi ||| Angles trisection||| Squaring the Circle regarding Phi||| Video of the two squares method
Discusion about the Pi as transcendental number|||: Not transcendental Pi||| The chained sets|||
Properties of equalities in limits||| The Phi right triangles ||| Pi and the Circumscription Theorem
Pi triangle by squaring the circle : Vedeo Pi triangle ||| Squaring Pi demonstration by circumscription Theorem LatexPdf
Doubling the cube ||| Framing the circle ||| Phi and Pi: relation formula
Squaring circle with Phi (to 0.000005 of ideal ruler and compass)
Spherical molecules. ||| Genetic Heredity. ||| Metaphysics: Spanish only. ||| Brain and Consciousness. ||| Type of Genes T and D
Certainty Principle ||| From the Schrodinger cat to the Ferman's birds ||| The meaning of Dreams
Freely economy ||| Theoricles of Alexandria ||| Rainbow table of elements.||| Satire on the Quantum Mechanics
Cancer and precocious aging ||| Hardware and software of Genetics ||| The farmer and the quantum physicist
Dreams and unconscious logical computing
Andalusian Roof Tile. ||| Rotary Engine. ||| Water motors: Vaporization engines.
Triangular ferman's Houses .||| Pan for frying and poaching eggs ||| The fringed forest
Summary of Hydraulic Chenge Box
The Emperor's new clothes and the QM ||| Garbage Triangle: Quantum mechanics, Relativity, Standard theory
Fables and tales of the relativists clocks.||| Nuclei of galaxies.||| Particles accelerators.
Hydrocarbons, water and vital principles on the Earth. ||| Cosmos formula : Metaphysics
Ubiquity Principle of set.||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.
Chaos Fecundity. Symbiosis: from the Chaos to the Evolution.||| Speed-Chords in galaxies.
The ancient planets Asteron and Poseidon.||| The man and the testosterone.||| Toros say ||| The essence of life
Chaos + symbiosis = evolution ||| Future Cosmology: Satire on Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
The stupid tale of the astronaut that did not age
Video Universal Consciousness||| Who is God ||| Web Universal consciousness
Creation: Highlights||| First steps in metaphysics ||| A personal experience
Reason for the Cosmos' creation
Satirical: Hominidus Quanticus
The meaning of Quantum Mechanics
The specialization in science can drive us to the loss of the whole vision of things.
And this seems to be the current state in the Quantum Mechanics scientists.
To explain this problem, I try to expose some philosophy and basics principles about the consistent and peculiarities of mathematics.
The first question would be to revise the nature, reach and meaning of mathematics.
Mathematics is ALONE an expression language, say, a form of expression of physical problems using the number as base, while the speaking (or latter) language is a method of expression that use of the letter as base.
But the important question is that so much letter language as number or mathematics language alone are useful to express things, but they by themselves aren't the things.
If I say: "this apple is green", really I don't have creating an apple, neither colouring an apple, I'm alone expressing that there is an apple there.
Although I could be wrong if what it is in front of me is a pear.
So, the expression method can be wrong and give us fail solutions, and so, the expression of a thing never is guarantee of its authenticity.
Say, any expression could be true of false, and for proving its veracity we must to observe, study and corroborate that the expression is consequent with the physical reality of the event or thing.
But what occurs with the mathematical language and expression?
Because the same thing.
One mathematical expression or adjust could be true or false, and so, we have to prove its veracity with the observation and study of the physical element or event that we have expressing or adjusting.
For example: If I say the area of a square is (L^2, the side to the square) then with this expression I don't create any square or make that the whole Universe is full of squares, neither that when putting the waves function, immediately the Universe is full of particles.
In the same way, if what I say is that the area of a square is the cube of its side (L^3), then I'm wrong and the expression is erroneous.
Say, any mathematical expression has not any guarantee of being correct without a correct corroboration.
And in this question is where the Quantum Mechanics, and mainly its scientists, fail.
The Quantum Mechanics scientists believe that its mathematical formulas are methods of creation, not of expression, and all what they think and deduce mathematically is a true physical creation.
Later on, if their formulas go against the well-known physical laws, then they say that is these physical rules are the ones that are wrong, or that they aren't complete in this or that sides.
If it is necessary to lie or make confuse of manipulated proofs for try demonstrating the value of the QM, they proceed to these false or confuse proofs to complete their necessities.
Example of this is the core proof for the QM, say, the double slit experiment.
This proof, made correctly, say us that the light and particles are corpuscular particles not waves.
But the QM uses of confuse of partial proofs to asseverate the true of its formulas.
In the other hand, the necessary proving of the veracity of the QM formulas never is made, neither the logical comprehension of the same ones.
Alone the QM has to be accepted by the fact of being many mathematical formulas.
Doesn't care to be expression methods, they have to be seen as authentic physical creations.
Of course, with this procedure and lack of physical rigor and content, the results could be extremely stupid or ridiculous, as for example can be the distribution of electrons in atoms that is a true attack to the human intelligence.
In such a cases, we can concluding saying:
1.- The quantum scientists don't live in the physical world, but in their mental allegoric confusions.
2.- Any resemblance to reality is simply coincidental
I hope quantum physicists are not offended by this website, but sometimes you have to make a strong criticism to give a touch of attention to certain topics that have a lot of implantation despite their little consistency.
Friends, this is a simple but harsh criticism of the current state of science, therefore whoever is a lover and follower of current scientific conclusions, would be better not reading the article.
My apologies to them.
I understand that physical, cosmological, quantum science, etc. current is based on completely erroneous theories and models, something that perhaps always happened.
The current problem, which is when contradictions are found, we close our intelligence and comprehension capacity; we make these theories annul and replace it, and of course, we no longer stop having in our minds and brains the critical capacity for deduction and discussion, which has been replaced by "implantations of wrong cosmic models".
It does not matter that by analyzing the issues raised, but seeing that they do not coincide with physical logic and that they contradict the observed and deduced reality: We only dare to think "When the great scientists of our time defend it that way, then it will be so; who am I to think otherwise": But worse still, I would also be ostracized and ridiculed if I discuss these issues.
Simple notes on some of these incongruous theories or models:
-- Uncertainty Principle:
We all know that the momentum of a particle is measured there, on its position, and by the observation of its position changes over time (velocity). And that equally its mass is measured in its position and by its inertia to the change of position. Then Ix. Ip = f(h) is incongruent.
Daily demonstrated in particle accelerators: "The more accurately its position and position changes are measured, the more accurately the energy, mass, and momentum of the particles are measured."
-- Higgs' Boson:
It is not possible that a particle of an infinitesimal existence, and only achieved in particle accelerators, can give mass to the entire universe.
Multiple black holes are seen every day, (in the minds of its visionaries, of course) because despite intensely searching for them with powerful means of observation, only three rotating lights have been seen that are said to be a black hole.
Thank all you.