Of ferman: Fernando Mancebo Rodriguez--- Personal page. ----Spanish pages
You can see many of my works, in the following pages:
Video: Cosmic and atomic model
Double slit and camera obscura experiments: ferman experiment ||| Type of Waves: Questions of Quantum Mechanics
The socurces of gravity. ||| In favour of the cosmos theory of ferman FCM ||| Theory of Everything: summary
Model of Cosmos. ||| Atomic model ||| Development speed of forces.||| Magnets: N-S magnetic polarity.
Stellar molecules ||| Static and Dynamic chaos||| Inversion or Left-right proof
Chart of atomic measures||| The main foundations of the Cosmos' Structure
Positive electric charges reside in orbits.||| Mathematical cosmic model based on Pi.
Inexactness principle in observations ||| Einstein and the gravity ||| The Universal Motion ||| Atomic particles
Cosmic Geometry ||| Bipolar electronic: semiconductors ||| Multiverse or multi-worlds||| Light and photons
Quantum explanation of Gravity ||| Real physics versus virtual physics ||| The window experiment
Radial coordinates.||| Physical and mathematical sets theory. | Algebraic product of sets.
Planar angles: Trimetry.||| Fractions: natural portions.||| Cosmic spiral ||| Inverse values of parameters and operation
Equivalence and commutive property of division. ||| Concepts and Numbers. ||| Bend coefficient of curves ||| Mathematical dimensions
Transposition property ||| Accumulated product: Powers ||| Dimensional Geometry: Reversibility
Priority Rule in powers and roots ||| The decimal counter ||| The floating point index ||| Paradoxes in mathematics
Direct formula for Pi: The Squaring Pi. ||| The pyramids of Squaring Pi. ||| Functions of Pi ||| Integration formulas Pi.
Squaring the Circle ||| Cocktail formula for Squaring Pi.
Spherical molecules. ||| Genetic Heredity. ||| Metaphysics: Spanish only. ||| Brain and Consciousness. ||| Type of Genes T and D
Certainty Principle ||| From the Schrodinger cat to the Ferman's birds ||| The meaning of Dreams
Freely economy ||| Theoricles of Alexandria ||| Rainbow table of elements.||| Satire on the Quantum Mechanics
Cancer and precocious aging ||| Hardware and software of Genetics ||| The farmer and the quantum physicist|||
Andalusian Roof Tile. ||| Rotary Engine. ||| Water motors: Vaporization engines.
Triangular ferman's Houses .||| Pan for frying and poaching eggs ||| The fringed forest
Garbage Triangle: Quantum mechanics, Relativity, Standard theory
Fables and tales of the relativists clocks.||| Nuclei of galaxies.||| Particles accelerators.
Hydrocarbons, water and vital principles on the Earth. ||| Cosmos formula : Metaphysics
Ubiquity Principle of set.||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.
Chaos Fecundity. Symbiosis: from the Chaos to the Evolution.||| Speed-Chords in galaxies.
The man and the testosterone.||| Toros say
Who is God
Cosmic Geometry versus Human Geometry
Spherical Geometry versus Cartesian Geometry
In physics and astrophysics we can observe as any central nucleus that executes any force or influence around it (matter and its gravity fields, magnetic fields, electric fields, etc. ) on other elements (often minor orbital ones), this influence of that central nucleus are spread and executed in spherical way from the central nucleus to its surrounding periphery.
(In not case the central nucleus executes its power and influence along the axis of the Cartesian coordinates, X,Y,Z.)
In astrophysics this is observed continuously when proving that gravity and magnetic fields are distributed spherically around the great celestial bodies, such as galaxies, stars, planets, moons, etc., of course, besides the equatorial plane rotation if these Astros have spin, but this also remains being spherical rotation.
Nevertheless, humans prefer invent, use and place space points by mean of the definition of the Cartesian coordinates, where elements are distributed in cube way along (or in the middle of) the axes of the Cartesian coordinates.
Although this is made due to the point (0) of the coordinates doesn't execute any type of influence or field of force, but alone a common reference point.
In this sense, we can say that our mind has quadrangular vision, say, we have a square mind.
Then, it is possible say that we define the spatial situation of any point P by mean of Cartesian coordinates P(x,y,z)
While the cosmos defines, acts, organizes and executes places y motions by mean of the number Pi. P = f(pi). See last drawing.
Macro and microcosms
In the macrocosms that we observe continuously, we can see as the actuation and distribution of physical elements is made in spherical and spiral ways, due to the elements are organized by mean of major central nuclei that spread and distribute their influence (gravity fields, magnetic fields, etc.) around them on other minor Astros, those which are captured, directed and forced to the rotation around the major ones with the final goal of encountering the perfect balance among fields of forces; attraction/repulsion forces; angular momentum, quantity of matter and speed of each one of them, etc.
But in the microcosms, what occurs?
Of course the same thing, because of here the same structural elements exist, with major central nuclei; gravity, magnetic and electric charges of attraction/repulsion; captured orbital ones, those which are forced to the rotation according their mass, speed of rotation, etc.
Then, which is the current problem of this physical field?
Because of the current Quantum Mechanics (QM) is invented by humans, and so, we reproduce and pretend that the microcosms works and fallows our own cosmic vision, and not the nature of the cosmos structuring.
Logically this pretension is totally erroneous (treating of being polite and putting it softly and respectfully) since due to our scientific sufficiency and self-importance don't allow us the required humility for revising such important error for taking conscience that the QM goes against the logic, observations and physical knowledge.
But not, we invent personal formulas (i.e. Schrodinger) and when we see that the results are against the physical laws, we simply say that these laws are wrong and the correct ones is our formulas, vision and physical pretensions.
Nevertheless, many questions would arise from this enormous wrong.
Could any serious physicist accepts that the electric attraction force that surrounding the central nuclei of atoms can redistribute electrons along the X, Y or Z axes of the Cartesian coordinate, remains this way in total unbalance the attraction forces (positive-negative) among nuclei and electrons?
No, electrons must to rotate around the central nuclei with adequate speed as for their distance from the nuclei to be in balance the system.
This way, any critical scientist should reject this QM pretension.
Although it seems to be that scientists prefer to be quiet and don't contradict to the masters of QM, perhaps for fear "to be accursed of ignorant".
I wouldn't like to be included in this group and prefer to protest of it.
For that, in this article I include the following satire drawing.
Sorry to those who could be annoyed for this satire.
Conjunction QM - Classical Physics
I put here a possible approximation between the planetary models of the classical physics with the distribution of orbital ones in stationary waves.