Wave function collapse .
Of ferman: Fernando Mancebo Rodriguez--- Personal page. ----Spanish pages

PHYSICS:
Video: Cosmic and atomic model
Double slit and camera obscura experiments: ferman experiment ||| Type of Waves: Questions of Quantum Mechanics
The socurces of gravity. ||| In favour of the cosmos theory of ferman FCM ||| Theory of Everything: summary
Model of Cosmos. ||| Atomic model ||| Development speed of forces.||| Magnets: N-S magnetic polarity.
Stellar molecules ||| Static and Dynamic chaos||| Inversion or Left-right proof ||| Scheme approach TOE
Chart of atomic measures||| The main foundations of the Cosmos' Structure ||| Unstable particles in accelerators
Short summary atomic model ||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.||| Mathematical cosmic model based on Pi.
Inexactness principle in observations ||| Einstein and the gravity ||| The Universal Motion ||| Atomic particles
Cosmic Geometry ||| Bipolar electronic: semiconductors ||| Multiverse or multi-worlds||| Light and photons
Quantum explanation of Gravity ||| Real physics versus virtual physics ||| The window experiment
Atomic Density ||| Linkin: Coeficients Lcf Mcf ||| Atomic nuclei structuring: Short summary
Few points about Cosmic Structuring.||| What is Time||| Simultaneity ||| The Cosmic tree ||| The Cosmic entropy
Interesting and short life of neutrons ||| Leptons field ||| Macro Microcosm, the same thing.
Fourth dimension of space.||| The way to get a unity theory||| UHECR Ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rays
Magnetic or entropy forces: types or classes||| Time observation and time emission ||| The universe expansion
Planetary Mechanics : Short summary ||| Easy explanation of the Planetary model||| State and type of Particles
Higgs boson and fields: wrong way ||| The positron proof: main types of magnetic fields
Current state of cosmology ||| Electromagnetic charges: reason and procedure ||| Neutron: The short and interesting life of
Type of Magnetic Forces ||| The big-bang and Universe' expansion ||| Astronomical chart: Astros, asteroids and microids
Certainty Principle: easy explanation ||| Certainty Principle and the Schrodinger's Cat ||| Wave function collapse
Relativity versus QM ||| The non-curvature of space by matter ||| The Master Clock
Ferman's light analysis
MATHEMATICS:
Radial coordinates.||| Physical and mathematical sets theory. | Algebraic product of sets.
Planar angles: Trimetry.||| Fractions: natural portions.||| Cosmic spiral ||| Inverse values of parameters and operation
Equivalence and commutive property of division. ||| Concepts and Numbers. ||| Bend coefficient of curves ||| Mathematical dimensions
Transposition property ||| Accumulated product: Powers ||| Dimensional Geometry: Reversibility
Priority Rule in powers and roots ||| The decimal counter ||| The floating point index ||| Paradoxes in mathematics
Direct formula for Pi: The Squaring Pi. ||| The pyramids of Squaring Pi. ||| Functions of Pi ||| Integration formulas Pi.
Squaring the Circle ||| Cocktail formula for Squaring Pi.||| Orbital coordinates in motion: Summary
Oscillating function: Cartesian oscillators ||| The ciclo as unit of angular speed ||| Squaring circles ruler and compass |||
Video: Squaring circles ruler and compass ||| The number Phi and the circumference.speed |||
The The extended Pi ||| Angles trisection||| Squaring the Circle regarding Phi||| Video of the two squares method
Discusion about the Pi as transcendental number|||: Not transcendental Pi||| The chained sets|||
Properties of equalities in limits||| The Phi right triangles ||| Pi and the Circumscription Theorem
Pi triangle by squaring the circle : Vedeo Pi triangle ||| Squaring Pi demonstration by circumscription Theorem LatexPdf
Doubling the cube ||| Framing the circle ||| Phi and Pi: relation formula
Squaring circle with Phi (to 0.000005 of ideal ruler and compass)
OTHER:
Spherical molecules. ||| Genetic Heredity. ||| Metaphysics: Spanish only. ||| Brain and Consciousness. ||| Type of Genes T and D
Certainty Principle ||| From the Schrodinger cat to the Ferman's birds ||| The meaning of Dreams
Freely economy ||| Theoricles of Alexandria ||| Rainbow table of elements.||| Satire on the Quantum Mechanics
Cancer and precocious aging ||| Hardware and software of Genetics ||| The farmer and the quantum physicist
Dreams and unconscious logical computing
INVENTIONS:
Andalusian Roof Tile. ||| Rotary Engine. ||| Water motors: Vaporization engines.
Triangular ferman's Houses .||| Pan for frying and poaching eggs ||| The fringed forest
Summary of Hydraulic Chenge Box
ARTICLES:
The Emperor's new clothes and the QM ||| Garbage Triangle: Quantum mechanics, Relativity, Standard theory
Fables and tales of the relativists clocks.||| Nuclei of galaxies.||| Particles accelerators.
Hydrocarbons, water and vital principles on the Earth. ||| Cosmos formula : Metaphysics
Ubiquity Principle of set.||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.
Chaos Fecundity. Symbiosis: from the Chaos to the Evolution.||| Speed-Chords in galaxies.
The ancient planets Asteron and Poseidon.||| The man and the testosterone.||| Toros say ||| The essence of life
Chaos + symbiosis = evolution ||| Future Cosmology: Satire on Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
The stupid tale of the astronaut that did not age
METAPHYSICS:
Video Universal Consciousness||| Who is God ||| Web Universal consciousness
Creation: Highlights||| First steps in metaphysics ||| A personal experience
Reason for the Cosmos' creation

Email: ferman25@hotmail.com
Email: ferman30@yahoo.es

Wave Function Collapse: Quantum Discussion

[HOTLIST]

Wave function collapse = Observation of any event.

The collapse of the wave function for a quantum physicist can be similar to the relativistic idea of the act of observation of an observer located in a different frame of reference from the observed event.
Of course, as for my opinion, both are wrong in their main foundation: That the wave collapse (or act of observation) influences the event, when it is totally the other way round: the wave collapse and act of observation occurs only in our brain for the information received, but it does not affect the event that it does not even "know or suffer" from being observed.
For any physical event, to be observed or not, does not affect at all.

* Very important: this consideration is essential to understand, since all the inconsistency and deviation of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity derive from it.
And of course the unconscious idea that we are the "center of the Universe" and that everything depends on us and that it bends and obey to our desires and understanding.

The wave function collapses (and changes or distorts) on our brain by the information received by any means of communication, such as light and its speed of emission.
But the wave function never collapses the physical events of the cosmos that follow its continuous rate of transformation and physical evolution.
Our mind or we do not emit information towards the events that can affect them and make them appear or disappear.
It is the physical events that emit information to our brain, and it is within this where the supposed collapse of the wave function occurs, which produces our erroneous and distorted realities.
In Relativity the astronaut does not age, where he does not age he is in our brain, because the speed of the light received (when come delayed) distorts our perception.
Relativity and quantum mechanics seem to pretend that we are Gods since for them our mental perspective makes physical events change and transform.
That is why I sometimes ask myself: It will be that we are extremely pretentious, having grandiose delusions, or just a little short of intelligence?.
Can we really believe that it is our observation of the physical phenomena that can give reality and consistency to the Cosmos.?
Is it our observation that gives life or death to Schrodinger's cat?
Is it our observation that makes the astronaut grows old?
Really?
Forgive me lovers of the quantum world, but I can't believe.

* Always relativistic observation (and the supposed quantum waves) come and impact towards us.
They never go from us to events.

[HOTLIST]

I would like to make a summary as short as possible of how I understand and value Quantum Mechanics.
I also understand that since this theory QM is praised and followed by a vast majority of the scientific world, my criticism of it will have the same result as that of an atheist propagandizing his disbelief in the middle of a papal mass.
Therefore I apologize, but I hope you understand my duty to expose my disagreements.

In all probability, for an immersed scientist and student of Quantum Mechanics, it will be very easy for him to accept it and follow its postulates, moreover, he will have complete security about them.
On the other hand, for me, after 40 years of reviewing it, trying to see its reliability and consistency, and reviewing its conclusions and justifications, I understand that it is an unfortunate theory, lacking in consistency in its basic structure, and contrary to all physical logic.

Of course, it has a positive part:

** It adapts like a chameleon to all the observations that are produced, but cheating of course:
Introducing new parameters (quantum= /quantum number, spin, azimuth, etc.) in such a way that only given the name of the new parameter, we already have the explanation and result that fits the observation, but of course it's all quantum or statistical, no logical physical explanation.
But of course, for those who are not satisfied with statistics, and want to know the real structure of physical events, this theory is not enough, and if you investigate a little, you will see that it has feet of clay and is hollow inside.

2.- Inconsistencies.

A).- The first contradiction that arises with Quantum Mechanics can be the initial postulate:
"In the microcosm the laws of classical physics are not fulfilled, but those of Quantum Mechanics".
In other words, the microcosm follows the mathematical formulas that we have invented (Schrodinger, ..), and they do not follow the physics already known and experienced around us.
For example, the electric and electromagnetic fields and charges that are created and are present in the atoms do not act there, what moves the electrons there is the Schrodinger formula.

B).- When the cosmos is observed, we see that all the systems of particles, bodies and stars; stars, planets; moons; galaxies, etc., even simple large meteorites, all of them join and organize themselves in orbital systems, one around the other, the smaller ones around the larger ones.
That is, the smaller bodies rotate around the larger ones, including the galaxies that produce a nucleus of higher density, on which other groups of less dense stars rotate.
Well, at the atomic level, Schrodinger's quantum formulas distribute electrons (only electrons, not other particles) without rotation around the nuclei, and laterally (pendant, like the grapes in the drawing) following a modality of Cartesian axes, and therefore without balance and compensation by rotation and nuclear attraction (centripetal force), with planetary rotation (centrifugal force).

C).- To solve and settle these incredible quantum postulates, it is enough to propose another, but as an axiom that we have to accept:
"The square of the wave function is to be taken as a possibility of finding an electron in such and such a place."
It's a chance statistic that has never been (and never will) be proven, and that goes against any physical force of movement.
So we have the duty to accept it as an axiom, and if we have doubts, it is enough to say:
"But man, it's been proven thousands of times in quantum experiments."

3.- My model and solution.

Of course, you could tell me, it is very easy to criticize without giving solutions: Well, not in my case.
My cosmic and atomic model structures the cosmos in a very simple way and at all levels of the cosmos, microcosm and macrocosm, structuring particle systems in the form of orbital systems, just as we observe them in the Cosmos. It is also a Theory of Everything that explains and structures all known cosmic forces, such as: Cosmic energy, gravity, matter, mass, magnetic fields and forces, electric charges, etc.

[HOTLIST]

[HOTLIST]

Thanks friends