Friends,

Here, we have a summary of the main characteristics of atomic nuclei, according to my model, TOE 1992.
As I show in the drawing, the simplest method of explanation is to see its equivalent in our cosmic level, that is, the stars and our sun.
As a theory, it maintains that the cosmic structures at all cosmic levels (microcosm, macrocosm, etc.) are the same and with the same elements and laws of construction, then we use the most comfortable level for our study, and apply it to all the others levels.
This procedure is very interesting because we can study the atoms internally by looking at the interior of our solar system; and we can in turn study solar systems externally reviewing the external behavior of atoms, such as the formation of bonds and molecules, etc.
Thus a binary ClNa molecule could be similar to a binary star.
So, if we look at a solar nucleus we see that it consists of a large amorphous nucleus of incandescent plasmas due to the great pressure of the matter that this nucleus contains, but without any type of component particles of that nucleus.
In addition, the pressure of matter and energy causes stars to emit a large amount of energy in the form of particles, including light.
Well, that is what atomic nuclei consist of, in a concentration of matter of great density, but forming an amorphous nucleus of plasma, also without well-defined particles.
Of course here we ask ourselves, but what substance or particles form that plasma that in stars are atoms. In the case of atomic nuclei, the infinitesimal particles that form them are the sub-atoms, (about 10^-80 g) But atomic nuclei should also give off a lot of energy.
Yes, this energy would be in the form of extraordinarily small particles that would form the background energy of the universe.

Therefore, this theory bets on the emission of background energy by all the matter in the universe, which could be measured even in a deep cave. (Take this as a prediction).

Friends,
As now new observations and tests are being made and published regarding the properties and potential of neutrinos that are supposed to be able to pass even through the earth with incredible ease and speed.
Well, I think that these assumptions are incorrect and that what is observed does not correspond to neutrinos and their strange properties.
According to my cosmic and atomic model, these observations are of the background energy that produces any concentration of matter with high energy density, such as atomic nuclei and also the sun and stars.
To these high energy density nuclei that emit this type of radiation (all kinds of energetic particles, including light; and in atomic nuclei, background radiation) I nambe as bright cores due to the great emission of energy radiation.
For this reason, I understand that the photos of supposed neutrinos that pass through the earth are simple background energy of the terrestrial matter.

Thank all you