Non-curvature of Space by Matter
Of ferman: Fernando Mancebo Rodriguez--- Personal page. ----Spanish pages
Video: Cosmic and atomic model
Double slit and camera obscura experiments: ferman experiment ||| Type of Waves: Questions of Quantum Mechanics
The socurces of gravity. ||| In favour of the cosmos theory of ferman FCM ||| Theory of Everything: summary
Model of Cosmos. ||| Atomic model ||| Development speed of forces.||| Magnets: N-S magnetic polarity.
Stellar molecules ||| Static and Dynamic chaos||| Inversion or Left-right proof ||| Scheme approach TOE
Chart of atomic measures||| The main foundations of the Cosmos' Structure ||| Unstable particles in accelerators
Short summary atomic model ||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.||| Mathematical cosmic model based on Pi.
Inexactness principle in observations ||| Einstein and the gravity ||| The Universal Motion ||| Atomic particles
Cosmic Geometry ||| Bipolar electronic: semiconductors ||| Multiverse or multi-worlds||| Light and photons
Quantum explanation of Gravity ||| Real physics versus virtual physics ||| The window experiment
Atomic Density ||| Linkin: Coeficients Lcf Mcf ||| Atomic nuclei structuring: Short summary
Few points about Cosmic Structuring.||| What is Time||| Simultaneity ||| The Cosmic tree ||| The Cosmic entropy
Interesting and short life of neutrons ||| Leptons field ||| Macro Microcosm, the same thing.
Fourth dimension of space.||| The way to get a unity theory||| UHECR Ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rays
Magnetic or entropy forces: types or classes||| Time observation and time emission ||| The universe expansion
Planetary Mechanics : Short summary ||| Easy explanation of the Planetary model||| State and type of Particles
Higgs boson and fields: wrong way ||| The positron proof: main types of magnetic fields
Current state of cosmology ||| Electromagnetic charges: reason and procedure ||| Neutron: The short and interesting life of
Type of Magnetic Forces ||| The big-bang and Universe' expansion ||| Astronomical chart: Astros, asteroids and microids
Certainty Principle: easy explanation ||| Certainty Principle and the Schrodinger's Cat ||| Wave function collapse
Relativity versus QM ||| The non-curvature of space by matter ||| The Master Clock
Radial coordinates.||| Physical and mathematical sets theory. | Algebraic product of sets.
Planar angles: Trimetry.||| Fractions: natural portions.||| Cosmic spiral ||| Inverse values of parameters and operation
Equivalence and commutive property of division. ||| Concepts and Numbers. ||| Bend coefficient of curves ||| Mathematical dimensions
Transposition property ||| Accumulated product: Powers ||| Dimensional Geometry: Reversibility
Priority Rule in powers and roots ||| The decimal counter ||| The floating point index ||| Paradoxes in mathematics
Direct formula for Pi: The Squaring Pi. ||| The pyramids of Squaring Pi. ||| Functions of Pi ||| Integration formulas Pi.
Squaring the Circle ||| Cocktail formula for Squaring Pi.||| Orbital coordinates in motion: Summary
Oscillating function: Cartesian oscillators ||| The ciclo as unit of angular speed ||| Squaring circles ruler and compass |||
Video: Squaring circles ruler and compass ||| The number Phi and the circumference.speed |||
The The extended Pi ||| Angles trisection||| Squaring the Circle regarding Phi||| Video of the two squares method
Discusion about the Pi as transcendental number|||: Not transcendental Pi||| The chained sets|||
Properties of equalities in limits||| The Phi right triangles ||| Pi and the Circumscription Theorem
Pi triangle by squaring the circle : Vedeo Pi triangle ||| Squaring Pi demonstration by circumscription Theorem LatexPdf
Doubling the cube ||| Framing the circle ||| Phi and Pi: relation formula
Squaring circle with Phi (to 0.000005 of ideal ruler and compass)
Spherical molecules. ||| Genetic Heredity. ||| Metaphysics: Spanish only. ||| Brain and Consciousness. ||| Type of Genes T and D
Certainty Principle ||| From the Schrodinger cat to the Ferman's birds ||| The meaning of Dreams
Freely economy ||| Theoricles of Alexandria ||| Rainbow table of elements.||| Satire on the Quantum Mechanics
Cancer and precocious aging ||| Hardware and software of Genetics ||| The farmer and the quantum physicist
Dreams and unconscious logical computing
Andalusian Roof Tile. ||| Rotary Engine. ||| Water motors: Vaporization engines.
Triangular ferman's Houses .||| Pan for frying and poaching eggs ||| The fringed forest
Summary of Hydraulic Chenge Box
The Emperor's new clothes and the QM ||| Garbage Triangle: Quantum mechanics, Relativity, Standard theory
Fables and tales of the relativists clocks.||| Nuclei of galaxies.||| Particles accelerators.
Hydrocarbons, water and vital principles on the Earth. ||| Cosmos formula : Metaphysics
Ubiquity Principle of set.||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.
Chaos Fecundity. Symbiosis: from the Chaos to the Evolution.||| Speed-Chords in galaxies.
The ancient planets Asteron and Poseidon.||| The man and the testosterone.||| Toros say ||| The essence of life
Chaos + symbiosis = evolution ||| Future Cosmology: Satire on Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
The stupid tale of the astronaut that did not age
Video Universal Consciousness||| Who is God ||| Web Universal consciousness
Creation: Highlights||| First steps in metaphysics ||| A personal experience
Reason for the Cosmos' creation
Non-curvature of Space by Matter
Supposed demonstrations are continually exposed that the theory of Relativity in relation to the curvature of space, is correct.
However, and to my understanding, they are only misinterpreted and erroneous deductions, which make me suspect that an attempt is only made to give value to research and observations for the mere fact of being in agreement with Relativity.
As can be seen in the drawing, the idea and theory of the curvature of space produced by matter or mass does not have consistency since a simple observer can appreciate that any object attracted by a large mass does not curve in its direction of approach, but rather that goes in a straight line and not towards a pole of that great mass.
It can also be analyzed and discussed the fact that any moving body that undergoes a curvature in its path, is slowed down by the change of direction of the inertial force that it carries, and therefore could never be accelerated as actually occurs in the attraction of an object by a large material mass.
On the other hand, if gravity was not an accelerating force, and it was only a cause of the curved space, then situated on the surface of the earth we would only be a curved body, but not accelerated towards the center of the earth, that is say, we would not weigh anything, could jump and fly as we pleased, etc.
But this does not happen, because we do weigh ourselves (me 65 kg.), And if we make a small jump, the earth counteracts this movement with a contrary force produced by gravity, which is therefore a force.
A supposed deformation of space, which only the great scientific minds know how to imagine correctly (but not explain), is only deformation, not thrust force.
Therefore, in the observation and measurement of movement, inertia, momentum, etc. from an attracted mass it is extracted as a consequence:
1.- That this attracted mass does so in a direct line towards the attracting mass.
2.- That it is not slowed down by having a curved road.
3.- That the attracted mass is impelled in its movement by fields of force (gravity) that, because it is concentric on the star that attracts it, this force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the mass that it is attracts.
As can be seen, there are three simple and clear observations that are always made in any approach movement between stars and attracted objects.
Now, as Relativity is considered for now, more as a dogma of faith than as a theory to discuss and verify, since it is preferred to ignore the simple and visible, and to look for new imaginary methods to make true what at first glance seems to be impossible.
Perhaps it is because we live in times of virtual and imaginary effects and we want to get away from the sad and boring of simple scientific research and discussion.
It is very funny that with our mathematical formulas we can create a parallel and virtual universe, in which there are virtual particles; being able to be in two or more places at the same time; create entanglements of particles; get mass and matter out of nothing; create wormholes that take us throughout the Universe, etc. etc.
As we see in the drawing, perhaps a bit exaggerated, the curvature of the space of Einstein and Schwarzschild is so far-fetched and far from visible reality that it is impossible to give it the least credibility, if you are a bit critical and minimally we review the proposal of these scientists.
Three simple observations:
1.- If space is deformed by matter, this which is also space will be deformed to the same degree of curvature and shape, and thus, a material nucleus (e.g. the sun) would follow this deformation., (as is seen in the drawing)
2.- If this deformation of space exists, each of the planets would also rotate in different planes of rotation on the sun (depending of the radius to the sun) following this curvature, as seen in the drawing.
But we see that this is not the case, and they all have a similar plane of rotation.
3.-All the stars, sun, planets, etc. They have a force of cohesion and compression of their masses in a spherical shape, reaching a great pressure inside them, for which a huge compression force is needed on the mass of the star, an issue that would not occur if the nuclear matter were only deformed into curve (which cannot even be imagined its shape for the simple reason that it is not possible)
Therefore I understand that it is a theory for faithful followers, but not for critics who look for the pros and cons of each theory.
The example of Saturn, like that of our planet, the sun, the observation of galaxies, etc. they show us that Einstein's curvature of space and Schwarzschild's metric are wrong theories.
However, for those who do not like the "raw" reality, they can scape of it with theoretical assumptions of imaginary black holes, those which everyone sees and knows perfectly (sorry for the sarcasm)
Saturn says no! to Einstein and Karl Schwarzschild
As we see in the drawing, Saturn is a planet that seems to be built on purpose to demonstrate the erroneousness of the theories of curvature of space by large material nuclei.
The completely flat orbital shape of its rings and moons tells us clearly that this planet does not curve space.
And we see it clearly, if we wish to do so, when verifying that from its more near vicinity to the distant moons, not even the smallest detail of that proposed Einstein curvature is observed.
If we go to other planets and observe the rotation and also flat situation of their moons, we observe that there is no curvature either.
If we go to the sun, we also observe the same thing.
And if we go to the galaxies, the rotation in a flat way of its star disc is also observed, with a more compact formation in its center.
So we ask ourselves, where do we have to go to observe the curvature of space?
Well, to our relativistic mind to imagine black holes that yes, those fulfill the Schwarzschild metric.
Below is a comparison of my model and that of Einstein (Schwarzschild)
I put drawing on the comparison of my model (TOE.1992) and Einstein's model (Schwarzschild)
In this model the deformation (of both gravitational and magnetic fields) is in spiral way due to the rotation of the large nuclei of matter.
With this spiral deformation, stationary orbits are created on the spin equator where orbitals (planets, moons, electrons, etc.) are driven and stabilized in them.
As we can see, the location of the elements that rotate around the nuclei (stars in the galaxies, planets in the solar systems, moons in the planets, electrons in the atoms, etc.) coincide with the deformation spiral of the magnetic fields and gravitational about the equator of rotation.
With this rotation, the north-south N-S polar direction is also created, with which stars, atoms, etc. are aligned. when creating molecules.