Friends, as I believe that this point of the distribution of orbitals in atoms is of first importance (also in stars), then I put a small article with a schematic summary of the main differences (and inconsistencies) between the old classical model and the Quantum model have relative to my model.

1.-

The old classical model is of the plenary type, but without detailing or approaching the situation of electrons in relation to known planetary systems.
But it is also inconsistent because with a positively charged nucleus it is not possible to keep the electrons rotating indefinitely as they would be attracted and fall on the nucleus easily and quickly.

2.-

The quantum model is less logical and even more contradictory.
On the one hand, keeping the positive electric charges in the nucleus and the negative ones in the electrons, he goes on to say that these charges do not act between them, but rather that what moves the electrons are formulas of probabilities that have never been verified or explained.
Why don't electric charges act where they are produced?
--- What force prevents it?
--- Would there be an "anti-gluon" that makes them reject each other?
But in addition, the quantum mathematicians have decided that they are going to apply the Cartesian coordinates to distribute the electrons, something childish, since we already know the cosmos and we see that everything is distributed and organized in a rotational and spherical way on the central nucleus.
Have we observed something in the Cosmos that is distributed in Cartesian coordinates? I think not.
That is up to our minds and their tastes for these types of coordinates.

3.-

My model is also planetary, but totally planetary, with the use of magnetic (and partly gravitational) fields to distribute the orbitals (electrons).
Equatorial rotation of the orbitals; North-South N_S polarity by rotation, for formation of molecules
In this model, every material nucleus produces magnetic fields and when these rotate, stationary orbits are created (which favor the location and maintenance of the orbitals or electrons).
But it is not the matter itself (nucleus) that contains the electropositive charges, but the magnetic fields and their created orbits.
Thus, magnetic fields create their electromagnetic orbits with a charge or electric potential (+1) each, and electrons are attracted to these orbits to capture them and keep them within the orbit.
But of course this could simply be a more or less logical theory, or more or less consistent.
Now, the tests and observations of the movements of electrons in chemical reactions of all kinds, makes this model seem totally correct:
They always move between orbits, where they are located and where they are exchanged.
If, for example, in chemical reactions of hydrogen, the electrons that it gives up or acquires never go to the nucleus, but to its electromagnetic orbit, which therefore has to contain the positive charge.
And if a positive orbits (+) remains empty of its electron, then immediately it begins to claim another by means of this charge (+)

Approximation to waves

Well, the explanation that I could give according to my modelm but trying to approch to the waves concept:
* Magnetic fields around a large particle (or star) have spherical range, but when rotating the central nucleus deformations are produced in these magnetic fields with the following peculiarities.
1. The rotation creates a North-South (N_S) polar direction, which helps the atoms to align themselves and produce reactions and composition of molecules with multiple atoms.
2.- Also due to the rotation there is a more pronounced compression and winding of the magnetic field by the equator of rotation.
Also in this equator of rotation is where the positive electromagnetic orbits are created, where later they will be attracted and located to the electrons. (all of this can be seen in the starting drawing)
Now, it would also be possible to study this structuring as an expansive and flat wave that goes from the nuclear center outwards on the equator of rotation, and where the electrons could be placed in the peak or top of each wave.
If we want to study that like this, then in the following drawing a possible measurement is exposed if this consideration of wave from the nuclear center is applied.

Thank you friends