Numbers in double slit experiment.
Of ferman: Fernando Mancebo Rodriguez--- Personal page. ----Spanish pages

Video: Cosmic and atomic model
Double slit and camera obscura experiments: ferman experiment ||| Type of Waves: Questions of Quantum Mechanics
The socurces of gravity. ||| In favour of the cosmos theory of ferman FCM ||| Theory of Everything: summary
Model of Cosmos. ||| Atomic model ||| Development speed of forces.||| Magnets: N-S magnetic polarity.
Stellar molecules ||| Static and Dynamic chaos||| Inversion or Left-right proof ||| Scheme approach TOE
Chart of atomic measures||| The main foundations of the Cosmos' Structure ||| Unstable particles in accelerators
Short summary atomic model ||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.||| Mathematical cosmic model based on Pi.
Inexactness principle in observations ||| Einstein and the gravity ||| The Universal Motion ||| Atomic particles
Cosmic Geometry ||| Bipolar electronic: semiconductors ||| Multiverse or multi-worlds||| Light and photons
Quantum explanation of Gravity ||| Real physics versus virtual physics ||| The window experiment
Atomic Density ||| Linkin: Coeficients Lcf Mcf ||| Atomic nuclei structuring: Short summary
Few points about Cosmic Structuring.||| What is Time||| Simultaneity ||| The Cosmic tree ||| The Cosmic entropy
Interesting and short life of neutrons ||| Leptons field ||| Macro Microcosm, the same thing.
Fourth dimension of space.||| The way to get a unity theory||| UHECR Ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rays
Magnetic or entropy forces: types or classes||| Time observation and time emission ||| The universe expansion
Planetary Mechanics : Short summary ||| Easy explanation of the Planetary model||| State and type of Particles
Higgs boson and fields: wrong way ||| The positron proof: main types of magnetic fields
Current state of cosmology ||| Electromagnetic charges: reason and procedure ||| Neutron: The short and interesting life of
Type of Magnetic Forces ||| The big-bang and Universe' expansion ||| Astronomical chart: Astros, asteroids and microids
Certainty Principle: easy explanation ||| Certainty Principle and the Schrodinger's Cat ||| Wave function collapse
The non-curvature of space by matter ||| The Master Clock
Radial coordinates.||| Physical and mathematical sets theory. | Algebraic product of sets.
Planar angles: Trimetry.||| Fractions: natural portions.||| Cosmic spiral ||| Inverse values of parameters and operation
Equivalence and commutive property of division. ||| Concepts and Numbers. ||| Bend coefficient of curves ||| Mathematical dimensions
Transposition property ||| Accumulated product: Powers ||| Dimensional Geometry: Reversibility
Priority Rule in powers and roots ||| The decimal counter ||| The floating point index ||| Paradoxes in mathematics
Direct formula for Pi: The Squaring Pi. ||| The pyramids of Squaring Pi. ||| Functions of Pi ||| Integration formulas Pi.
Squaring the Circle ||| Cocktail formula for Squaring Pi.||| Orbital coordinates in motion: Summary
Oscillating function: Cartesian oscillators ||| The ciclo as unit of angular speed ||| Squaring circles ruler and compass |||
Video: Squaring circles ruler and compass ||| The number Phi and the circumference.speed |||
The The extended Pi ||| Angles trisection||| Squaring the Circle regarding Phi||| Video of the two squares method
Discusion about the Pi as transcendental number|||: Not transcendental Pi||| The chained sets|||
Properties of equalities in limits||| The Phi right triangles ||| Pi and the Circumscription Theorem
Pi triangle by squaring the circle : Vedeo Pi triangle ||| Squaring Pi demonstration by circumscription Theorem LatexPdf
Doubling the cube ||| Framing the circle ||| Phi and Pi: relation formula
Squaring circle with Phi (to 0.000005 of ideal ruler and compass)
Spherical molecules. ||| Genetic Heredity. ||| Metaphysics: Spanish only. ||| Brain and Consciousness. ||| Type of Genes T and D
Certainty Principle ||| From the Schrodinger cat to the Ferman's birds ||| The meaning of Dreams
Freely economy ||| Theoricles of Alexandria ||| Rainbow table of elements.||| Satire on the Quantum Mechanics
Cancer and precocious aging ||| Hardware and software of Genetics ||| The farmer and the quantum physicist
Dreams and unconscious logical computing
Andalusian Roof Tile. ||| Rotary Engine. ||| Water motors: Vaporization engines.
Triangular ferman's Houses .||| Pan for frying and poaching eggs ||| The fringed forest
Summary of Hydraulic Chenge Box
The Emperor's new clothes and the QM ||| Garbage Triangle: Quantum mechanics, Relativity, Standard theory
Fables and tales of the relativists clocks.||| Nuclei of galaxies.||| Particles accelerators.
Hydrocarbons, water and vital principles on the Earth. ||| Cosmos formula : Metaphysics
Ubiquity Principle of set.||| Positive electric charges reside in orbits.
Chaos Fecundity. Symbiosis: from the Chaos to the Evolution.||| Speed-Chords in galaxies.
The ancient planets Asteron and Poseidon.||| The man and the testosterone.||| Toros say ||| The essence of life
Chaos + symbiosis = evolution ||| Future Cosmology: Satire on Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
The stupid tale of the astronaut that did not age
Video Universal Consciousness||| Who is God ||| Web Universal consciousness
Creation: Highlights||| First steps in metaphysics ||| A personal experience
Reason for the Cosmos' creation


Numbers and proportion in the double slit experiment.


Friends, as I am in a time of criticism of quantum mechanics, well I put another discussion, in this case referring to the double slit experiment.
It is simply numerically adjusting the aspect ratio (approximation) between the particles and their supposed accompanying waves.
Looking at the electron for example, if it has a diameter of 10^-16 m., we see that its wave on the screen would be approximately one meter.
That is, its wave would be 10^16 times greater than the particle, and in a comparison in the drawing we have assumed that the electron is a pea seed, and that its wave could be 10 times the dimension of the solar system.
That is, a theory of accompanying waves whose dimension is of 10^16 or more of the measure of the particles, and that also developed in a vacuum, that wave must have or be composed of a substance that also works in a vacuum.
And it is also necessary to explain what kind of wave or oscillation that substance develops.
Well, in real physics we cannot abstract ourselves (inventing an imaginary wave) and continue to start from our imagination creating some physics, also imaginary.
You have to explain the consistency of the physical elements, and therefore explain what the waves that circulate through a vacuum are made of in the first place, and that they become 10^16 larger than the particles.
Now, if we want to work only within our brain and our imagination, well we can do it, but we will not be doing physics, but simply mental "games of thrones".


In this case I would like to make an observation (sorry for making another one) about the demonstration of the double slit experiment to justify particles as waves, and therefore the foundation of quantum mechanics.
If we consider that the electron wave can be extended to the entire reference frame of the experiment, then a fairly simple question arises:
But which electrons are waves, only the ones that interest us for the experiment, or are all the electrons in the reference frame waves?
If the electrons are waves, and they reach the entire reference frame of the experiment such as the screen, wall, etc., the components of the screen, grid, intermediate air, etc. are also electrons (and waves).
If all of these electrons are waves as well (remember that they are also moving), then all of these waves are full and run through the entire device of the experiment, interacting and collapsing to emission waves.
And this is demonstrable in any similar experiment, such as,
- If in a large room we have hundreds of light bulbs that fill the entire room with light, now we turn on another bulb, the latter will not make any change in intensity nor will it have a clear interference with the others, nor with itself.
- If we have 50 speakers in the same room, and we put one more later, the latter will have no chance of being appreciated and measuring its interference.
But we can decide that the electrons inside the atoms are not waves, but the outside ones.
But no, we cannot do it because if they are not waves inside the atoms, then the wave function, study of the possibilities of their situation, etc., that is, the laws of quantum mechanics, would not be applicable there inside atoms.