The principle of certainty will tell us that:
"All the measurements and observations of any particle parameters will help us to find other complementary parameters and complete the total certainty of the particle Cx + Cp = Ct."
"The certainty about the different parameters of any particle do not devaluate each other, but they add certainty"
The Uncertainty Principle is FALSE AND WRONG, since to measure the momentum of any particle it is essential and basic to know and use the position parameters (location, position changes and deviation, etc.). Some support and adjust to the others as it happens daily in particle accelerators.

Preamble: Uncertainty Principle

I understand that Werner Karl Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle is just an imaginary theory, poorly formulated and lacking a minimum logic that a similar theory should contain.
The first "condition" that this postulate seems to put, is that to observe and measure a particle we must emit certain waves or certain particles that interact with the one we want to measure, and that give us an answer, but having already distorted the parameters of the particle to measure.
Nothing is further from reality, because whenever we observe correctly we do so with the qualities of the observed element without distorting it, be it light emitted by it, fluorescence when passing through a suitable medium (particle accelerators), use of the charges and magnetic fields that emits the particle to be measured, etc.
Therefore, and with all due respect to its supporters, I understand that his explanations are simple attempts to evade the work and responsibility of facing a serious and fruitful discussion about these events.

Uncertainty example of the electron and photon that measures it

Here the previous explanation is observed, where the example of the photon that interacts with the electron to find its location is put, and the photon destabilizes it, not being able to measure it later to find its moment.
But can its momentum be measured with a photon?
How?
But if we can accept that it can be done, then let's measure firstly the momentum of the electron and we will verify that we have also found the place (situation) to be able to measure it in that place.
In other words, the Principle of Certainty of this particle is fulfilled.

Harsh criticism of the uncertainty principle

No, I'm sorry, this quantum principle of Uncertainty seems only a mental manipulation so that we close our eyes to critical discussion, and then accept new laws and magical quantum formulas that will discover all the truths of the Cosmos.
Once the quantum formulas are magical and you don't have to understand them, everything they say will be extraordinary and magical as well.

Principle of Certainty (Figure 1,2)

Thus, simplified as it is in this article and simply looking at the observer of particles and on the observations of these in various media such as particle accelerators, we can say that contrary to what the Uncertainty Principle postulates, all the observations and measurements that we do on particles using non-harmful means*, they are complementary to each other, and any measurements help to check and adjust the others.

* In any case, if we use harmful means we can first measure the momentum, with which we will also obtain the situation.
Therefore, the principle of certainty will tell us "that all the measurements and observations of the particle parameters will help us to find other complementary parameters and complete the total certainty of the particle Cx + Cp = Ct."

"Therefore, the sum of the certainty value of each parameter will give us the total certainty value of the particle, that is:
The total certainty of a particle is directly proportional to the certainty that we have about each of its parameters."

In drawing 2, we see how in particle accelerators the Certainty Principle is fulfilled since all the parameters of the particles created or measured there are supported by each other to make the correct adjustments.
In this sense, the logic and practice are clear and forceful, and discredit the erroneous logic that the Uncertainty Principle tries to impose.

The Principle of Certidimbre can also be explained with the example and quantum vision of Schrodinger's cat, within which and for a new observer (who does not know the details of the experiment) there exists in it a quantum superposition with all possible possibilities, ( that there is a cat, a mouse, a cake, a coin, etc.).
But by opening the box and collapsing the wave function, this new observer will be able to measure the situation and the momentum (if the cat is alive and moving, if it is hungry and meows, if it has good blood pressure, etc.), with what will be verified that the sum of certainty data will give us the total certainty of the content of the experiment.

Wave function collapse = Observation of any event.

* Very importante: this consideration is essential to understand, since all the inconsistency and deviation of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity derive from it.
And of course the unconscious idea that we are the "center of the Universe" and that everything depends on us and that it bends and obey to our desires and understanding.

The wave function collapses (and changes or distorts) on our brain by the information received by any means of communication, such as light and its speed of emission.
But the wave function never collapses the physical events of the cosmos that follow its continuous rate of transformation and physical evolution.
Our mind or we do not emit information towards the events that can affect them and make them appear or disappear.
It is the physical events that emit information to our brain, and it is within this where the supposed collapse of the wave function occurs, which produces our erroneous and distorted realities.
In Relativity the astronaut does not age, where he does not age he is in our brain, because the speed of the light received (when come delayed) distorts our perception.
Relativity and quantum mechanics seem to pretend that we are Gods since for them our mental perspective makes physical events change and transform.
That is why I sometimes ask myself: It will be that we are extremely pretentious, having grandiose delusions, or just a little short of intelligence?
Can we really believe that it is our observation of the physical phenomena that can give reality and consistency to the Cosmos.? Is it our observation that gives life or death to Schrodinger's cat?
Is it our observation that makes the astronaut grows old?
Really?
Forgive me lovers of the quantum world, but I can't believe.

* Always relativistic observation (and the supposed quantum waves) come and impact towards us.
They never go from us to events.