1.- Preamble

In my theory this does not fit since the length or line is a succession of points; that surface or area is a succession of lines, and that volume is a succession of surfaces.
And to represent and define these dimensions we do it by means of the previous dimension multiplied or composed with a succession of it that tends to infinity.
The first dimension or line would be represented by the point P, multiplied by the natural numbers N.
Longitude = Point x N (............) That united give (_________)

Therefore we can say that a point in space (.) is an infinitesimal of space but that it already contains the qualities of space and therefore it must have a dimension or measure, although it is so small that we would never be able to measure.
So we can express it by putting:
Measurement limit > Point (dot) > Zero; Lm > P > 0
But what justification, different from the Euclidean, has this expression,
Well, if by Euclid we multiply P.N, and being P=0, then P.N = 0 and there would be no length, no surface, no volume, etc.

2.- Dimensions

1D, 2D, 3D
Since we are already established, we will not give the point (P) number of dimensions, that is, P is simply an infinitesimal of length.
To be a dimension we need the product of the previous dimension, by the sequence of natural numbers N that builds that dimensional sequence, and that we have already seen the example (PxN = L).
So the first dimension would be the Length L (1D)
And we could represent it as we have said:

---1D, --- longitude, L = P.N, where N will always be the natural numbers that produce a succession of Points in space.
---2D, --- surface, S = L.N, lateral succession of lines that produces an area.
---3D, --- volume, V = S.N, lateral succession of surfaces that produces a volume

2 A.-
4D (Cosmic Levels Dimension, or exponential dimension of space)

This is a mathematical dimension or property, that space acquires because it is composed and measured by these mathematical characteristics. Let's see:
In mathematics we could distinguish two important characteristics or dimensions of numerical qualities, which are the flat mathematical dimension, and the exponential or level mathematical dimension.
The first thing we do in mathematics to be able to operate is the creation of numerical systems in which we always choose a unit (1) and with it and through the natural numbers (N) we count and move with these natural numbers, always in the flat sense previously referred.
For example, with the space:
-- We take the meter as a unit (unit referring to the dimension of our body and physical environment), and with it we can move and walk (flat, step by step) forward, 1m, 2m, 3m, 4m, etc. . And so on, hypothetically to infinity.
- But now let's think that it is not us humans, but a small acarus who takes the relative unit of it (1mm) and begins to move millimetre by millimetre.
This way, the acarus would already be at a lower level than ours, and he would be moving in HIS flat dimension, that is, in millimetres.
-- But let us think that it is not a mite, but a unicellular being that moves in this case, micrometre by micrometre.
This case, the unicellular would be on another level of movement in the cosmos. (Also along its plane or level of micrometres.)
-- Let us now think that it is a rare being residing in the atomic nucleus where it moves. This case he would be doing it in femtometre after femtometre.
-- But let us now think in great, in this case refering us to an imaginary and enormous giant that circulates through the galaxies. Well, in this cas he would be doing it in millions of light years, one after one.
And so on, with infinites examples of levels.
Well, this set of levels ( which we could also represent as 4D = 3D.N ), is a new composition or dimension of cosmic levels 4D that structure the entire Universe.
In this sense, and if we see and analyse the composition and structure of matter through this dimension, we can intuit that both atoms and stars are the same structure, but at a different cosmic level.
And furthermore we will also intuit that lower than the atoms and higher than the stars there must be other levels that, like space itself, tend to infinity.
In this case, we would be discovering what the Multiverse consists of, so sought after and so close.

2B.-
5D: The time

At first I considered 5D time and 6D universal motion as the same element, however and to study it better, I divided them into two dimensions.
As we have seen before, we could consider 5D time as a product of 4D.N = 5D, that is, if we add successively to the previous four dimensions through another separate dimension, then we would obtain 5D.
And one way would be to successively repeat these 4Ds through another or time. As an example:
Take a rock (or an egg, or a potato) that exists at time 1, but also exists at time 2, also at time 3, etc. And so on.
That is, any of these elements could exist from now until the end of time, through the time dimension.
Of course, it would always be immutable, without change, always the same element and with the same circumstances.
So to produce changes, action and performance of the elements, what do we need?
Well, the ability of moving.
But so the transformation and cosmic evolution to be consistent, it is necessary that this movement be total, that is, in each and every one of the previous dimensions, and in each and every one of its points.
Of course, that is what the sixth dimension 6D consists of, in total and extensive movement throughout the entire cosmos.

2 C.-
6D: Universal Motion

We can consider universal movement as a dimensional form, by which each of the points of a dimension moves towards the next continuously, and measured by time.
To do this, it is necessary that the movement follows the logical order of the dimensions, that is, it has to move starting from the 1D direction, that is, in the form of a 1D linear movement.
This is verified by their results, that is, we observe that the movement through the cosmos is carried out in a linear way since each movement conserves the linear inertia of movement, and never does it in a circular or curved way, but always in the inertial sense of a straight-line. On the other hand, we also verify that this dimension exists, because in each and every one of the places in the cosmos this movement occurs; nothing is standing still, everything moves, transforms, erodes, evolves, ages, etc.,
On the other hand we can also consider different kinds of movement, for example:
Linear movement, as occurs in the movement of a car, but also three-dimensional exists, which gives us results of transformation, evolution, erosion, etc.
In the universe, everything is movement, everything is 6D.

Some considerations: Energy, gravity, matter.

Logically, all these dimensions must be the basis for the cosmic structuring that we know, but here we will only contemplate the basic and primary ones for this structuring.

1.- Cosmic energy.
First of all we would have the cosmic energy, and that we could consider it as the essence and first result of the performance of the 6D.
As we have said, universal movement consists of the linear movement (linear inertia) of each moving point in space passing consecutively to the next.
This creates a total and constant movement throughout the universe.
Of course, this movement on any other element that could be in space, such as material bodies, will also be forced to move with a certain speed and inertia.
Therefore, this capacity for movement and drag is what we will call COSMIC ENERGY that can be applied to any element or body that is in space and therefore is composed by space

2.- Gravity, Matter.

We see that cosmic energy is motion of dragging throughout the universe and in all directions, but always in a linear way.
Of course, seen in this way, it could be considered that being in all directions and being distributed these lines of movement throughout the cosmos, their result would be null, and also the lines of energy could never be added to others to form groups of greater energy.
But it is not like that, ("Cosmic intelligence has a solution for everything") since the three-dimensional quality of space, causes multiple concentric lines of energy to converge on any point P of the same, which, as they regroup, join and add up mutually forming Points of concentric energy throughout the cosmos.
But to be concentric motions lines toward these point, they also have the property of dragging and attracting each other to form conglomerates of points.
Well, this concentric force of mutual attraction, sum and union is what GRAVITY consists of.
That is, gravity in the form of concentric action of cosmic energy, which allows this energy to join, condense and to form conglomerates of cosmic energy each time bigger.
And the conglomerates of energy points, once stabilized in orbital systems (with impenetrability between them due to their magnetic fields), is what we call and what MATTER consists of.

Let us think that the Cosmic Entity has already created the previous 4D dimensions and wants to continue creating all kinds of elements and characters in the Cosmos.
What is missing for that?
Well, the movement. Anything you build if it doesn't move has no meaning or ability.
And we ask ourselves: But, do all things have movement?
Of course, in the Cosmos everyone moves, nothing is absolutely stationary or static: everything has some kind of movement, both externally and internally.
This way, once the Cosmic Entity was convinced that it needed a new dimension or the dimension of movement, how would it create it?
Well, surely it would start by giving this movement characteristic to the entire Cosmos, starting with the first 1D dimension or length.
And how would you do it? Well, easy: making each component point of the first dimension or longitude move to the next, then to the next, and so on for each and every one of the points of the first 1D dimension.
Now, this capacity for movement is also a drag capacity for everything that is made up of points in space, which, in addition to movement, represents a force of action for dragging everything that is in the Cosmos.
But, how do we know this cosmic property of drag force?
As Cosmic Energy, of course.
Then by creating the Cosmic Entity to movement, it is also creating the cosmic Energy that is located, distributed and composed of the entire Cosmos, together with the other dimensions.
So we already have all the cosmic dimensions: 1D length, 2D surface, 3D volume, 4D cosmic levels, 5D time, and finally, the 6D universal movement, which also translates into Cosmic Energy, distributed and filling throughout the Universe or Cosmos.

But and this movement applied in the third and fourth dimension, how does it develop?
Well, it cancels in the parallel directions, but the same does not happen in the concentric direction on each one of the points of space.
On any point in space, all the lines of movement that are approaching it, intertwine, add up and form an autonomous cosmic energy point, which can in turn add up and join others forming conglomerates of cosmic energy points, that later will give us the matter.

---- And here GRAVITY is born, like the concentric action of cosmic energy lines when they are directed and add up to any point in space.
Therefore, GRAVITY is the concentric form of action of cosmic energy. It is a special case of action of this energy.

This way, Gravity are FIELDS of concentric forces that theoretically would reach to infinity, but as the material particles and their existing gravity fields in the cosmos are also almost infinite, because far from the material particles that produce them, they dissolve and cancel each other among them, and therefore only act at small and medium distances.

---Construction of the MATTER:

Once gravity forms points of energy in the cosmos, and these come together forming ever larger conglomerates of these points of energy, an excess of concentrated energy is produced in these accumulations, and in response to this great pressure of energy and to To maintain the balance and average density of energy in the cosmos, a force of expansion and distribution of energy is born in these accumulations that in physics we know with the general name of MAGNETIC FORCES, and that end up forming orbital systems, (with a nucleus and orbitals to its around) creating systems of great volume and with the average density of energy already adequate for the Cosmos.
Now then, all these forces of expansion of forces and magnetic fields, once "validated" by the occupation of orbitals, form expansive fields that do not allow other similar fields to invade and penetrate them, with which the orbital system acquires the characteristic of IMPENETRABILITY, typical of matter.
Therefore, MATTER has the property of IMPENETRABILITY given by the magnetic fields of its component elements, in our case the atoms.
* And stars also have this property of impenetrability, reason why they cannot merge with each other, unless there are collisions at very high speeds (close to speed of light C).

---- What is MASS?

---Now, how is the mass or quantity of matter of a particle measured?
Because of the gravitational attraction between them, measured in weight according to the mutual approximation force they exert and on measuring devices such as scales.

Currently, the Standard Model and quantum physics describe a microcosm composed of a not very extensive range of "elementary particles" equal to each other.
But this range of particles is expanding year after year, from ancient Greece with Democritus and his minimum indivisible particles or atom, through Dalton and his chemical reactions; Thomson and Rutherford with the discovery of the electron and its subsequent distribution in the nucleus and orbiting electrons; until concluding destroying the atomic nucleus and finding sub-nuclear particles such as quarks.
More or less here we are, but besides, with some fanciful and not real inventions such as gluons, Higgs boson, etc.
The problem that we are beginning to glimpse is that we are already having too many sub-atomic particles that we do not know how to organize them or what to do with them.
Sometimes I remember my prediction about it (1975-1992):
"The more particles are progressively discovered, the less sense the Standard Model will make":
Well, the point of view has to change and forget about "standard particles", and to change to the groups or "ranges of similar particles".
To do this we look at the fourth dimension 4D, or dimensional cosmic levels.
Cosmic matter is structured in cosmic levels through the fourth dimension, in such a way that units of any level, for example our microcosm (atoms) can be gathered, added and structured in another higher level such as the stars (our macrocosm), and so on.
But between a lower and a higher system, what kind of particles exists?
Well, of any dimension, (theoretically from 1 to approximately 10^57 types of particles).
So how can we organize so many particles for study?
Well, studying them by groups or ranges according to their size.
In my cosmic and atomic model they are distributed in the following groups of stable particles:
Luminous particles: from 10^-80 g. at 10^-60g.
Calorific particles: from 10^-60 g. at 10^-40g.
Neutrinos: from 10^-40 g to 10^-30 g
Leptons: from 10^-30 g to 10^-24 g
Atoms: from 10^-24 g. at 4x10^-22g.
Of course, if we destroy atomic nuclei, they can give us other unstable particles that will try to become stable, already as some of the previous ones.
** As we are only referring to the types of particles, we will only say that to be stable, large particles need to associate and become orbital systems (nuclei with orbitals around them) and thus maintain a state of required energy density (Da) for distribution of energy throughout the Cosmos.

Thank you friends

My works